Obama administration pursuing climate accord

President seeks to bypass Senate

Share with others:

Print Email Read Later

WASHINGTON — The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion is work­ing to forge a sweep­ing in­ter­na­tional cli­mate change agree­ment to com­pel na­tions to cut their planet-warm­ing fos­sil fuel emis­sions but with­out rat­i­fi­ca­tion from Con­gress.

In prep­a­ra­tion for this agree­ment, to be signed at a U.N. sum­mit meet­ing in 2015 in Paris, the ne­go­ti­a­tors are meet­ing with dip­lo­mats from other coun­tries to bro­ker a deal to com­mit some of the world’s larg­est econ­o­mies to en­act laws to re­duce their car­bon pol­lu­tion. But un­der the Con­sti­tu­tion, a pres­i­dent may en­ter into a le­gally bind­ing treaty only if it is ap­proved by a two-thirds ma­jor­ity of the Senate.

To side­step that re­quire­ment, Pres­i­dent Barack Obama’s cli­mate ne­go­ti­a­tors are de­vis­ing what they call a “po­lit­i­cally bind­ing” deal that would “name and shame” coun­tries into cut­ting their emis­sions. The deal is likely to face strong ob­jec­tions from Cap­i­tol Hill Re­pub­li­cans and poor na­tions around the world, but ne­go­ti­a­tors say it may be the only re­al­is­tic path.

“If you want a deal that in­cludes all the ma­jor emit­ters, in­clud­ing the U.S., you can­not re­al­is­ti­cally pur­sue a le­gally bind­ing treaty at this time,” said Paul Bled­soe, a top cli­mate change of­fi­cial in the Clin­ton ad­min­is­tra­tion, who works closely with the Obama White House on in­ter­na­tional cli­mate change pol­icy.

Law­mak­ers in both par­ties on Cap­i­tol Hill say there is no chance that the grid­locked Senate will rat­ify a cli­mate change treaty in the near fu­ture, es­pe­cially in a po­lit­i­cal en­vi­ron­ment where many Re­pub­li­can law­mak­ers re­main skep­ti­cal of the es­tab­lished sci­ence of human-caused global warm­ing.

“There’s a strong un­der­stand­ing of the dif­fi­cul­ties of the U.S. sit­u­a­tion and a will­ing­ness to work with the U.S. to get out of this im­passe,” said Lau­rence Tubi­ana, the French am­bas­sa­dor for cli­mate change to the United Na­tions. “There is an im­plicit un­der­stand­ing that this not re­quire rat­i­fi­ca­tion by the Senate.”

U.S. ne­go­ti­a­tors are in­stead hom­ing in on a hy­brid agree­ment — a pro­posal to blend le­gally bind­ing con­di­tions from an ex­ist­ing 1992 treaty with new vol­un­tary pledges. The mix would cre­ate a deal that would up­date the treaty, and thus, ne­go­ti­a­tors say, not re­quire a new vote of rat­i­fi­ca­tion.

Coun­tries would be le­gally re­quired to en­act do­mes­tic cli­mate-change pol­i­cies — but would vol­un­tar­ily pledge to achieve spe­cific lev­els of emis­sions cuts and to chan­nel money to poor coun­tries to help them adapt to cli­mate change. Coun­tries might then be le­gally ob­li­gated to re­port their prog­ress to­ward meet­ing those pledges at meet­ings held to iden­tify those na­tions that did not meet their cuts.

“There’s some le­gal and po­lit­i­cal magic to this,” said Jake Sch­midt, an ex­pert in global cli­mate ne­go­ti­a­tions with the Nat­u­ral Re­sources De­fense Coun­cil, an ad­vo­cacy group. “They’re try­ing to move this as far as pos­si­ble with­out hav­ing to reach the 67-vote thresh­old” in the Senate.

The strat­egy comes as sci­en­tists warn that the earth is al­ready ex­pe­ri­enc­ing the first signs of hu­man-caused global warm­ing — more se­vere drought and stron­ger wild­fires, ris­ing sea lev­els and more dev­as­tat­ing storms — and as the United Na­tions heads to­ward what many say is the body’s last chance to avert more cat­a­strophic re­sults in the com­ing cen­tury. At the U.N. Gen­eral As­sem­bly in New York next month, del­egates will gather at a side­line meet­ing on cli­mate change to try to make prog­ress to­ward the deal next year in Paris. A Decem­ber meet­ing is planned in Lima, Peru, to draft the ac­cord.

In seek­ing to go around Con­gress to push his in­ter­na­tional cli­mate change agenda, Mr. Obama is echo­ing his do­mes­tic cli­mate strat­egy. In June, he by­passed Con­gress and used his ex­ec­u­tive au­thor­ity to or­der a far-reach­ing reg­u­la­tion forc­ing U.S. coal-fired power plants to curb their car­bon emis­sions. That reg­u­la­tion, which would not be fi­nal un­til next year, al­ready faces le­gal chal­lenges.

But uni­lat­eral ac­tion by the world’s larg­est econ­omy will not be enough to curb the rise of car­bon pol­lu­tion across the globe. That will be pos­si­ble only if the world’s larg­est econ­o­mies agree to en­act sim­i­lar cuts.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s in­ter­na­tional cli­mate strat­egy is likely to in­fu­ri­ate Re­pub­li­can law­mak­ers who al­ready say the pres­i­dent is abus­ing his ex­ec­u­tive au­thor­ity by push­ing through ma­jor pol­i­cies with­out con­gres­sio­nal ap­proval.

united nations - United States - North America - United States government - Europe - Barack Obama - France - Western Europe - United States Congress - U.S. Republican Party - George W. Bush - United States Senate - Paris - Mitch McConnell


You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here