In court, immigrant children lead the line

Share with others:

Print Email Read Later

NEW YORK — Yo­vany’s first op­por­tu­nity to face the U.S. justice sys­tem came late Thurs­day morn­ing, more than a month af­ter his jour­ney from Guate­mala ended in a U.S. de­ten­tion cen­ter near the South­west bor­der.

Alone, the 16-year-old en­tered an im­mi­gra­tion court­room in lower Man­hat­tan and braced for mer­ci­less­ness. In­stead, he met Judge F. James Lo­prest Jr. “Do you have a law­yer?” the judge asked, his tone soft, his ca­dence gen­tle. He pa­tiently ex­plained that the na­tion’s im­mi­gra­tion laws were com­pli­cated and en­cour­aged the boy to get a law­yer to ex­plore pos­si­ble re­lief from de­por­ta­tion.

“I’m sup­posed to act as a ref­eree,” Judge Lo­prest con­tin­ued. “But I’m happy to give you the time that you need.”

Yo­vany was among 55 chil­dren who have come be­fore the judge this week as part of a new ac­cel­er­ated court pro­cess, a cor­ner­stone of the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s strat­egy to deal with the surge of un­ac­com­pa­nied mi­nors from Cen­tral Amer­ica.

Under the new pro­ce­dures, the Justice Depart­ment is mov­ing chil­dren who re­cently ar­rived to the head of the line to see im­mi­gra­tion judges, pos­si­bly lead­ing to de­por­ta­tion within a mat­ter of months rather than years, the usual time frame amid the tre­men­dous back­logs in the im­mi­gra­tion court sys­tem. Quicker de­por­ta­tions, some of­fi­cials have said, might send a strong mes­sage to the coun­tries where the chil­dren are com­ing from and help to de­ter oth­ers from mi­grat­ing il­le­gally.

But im­mi­grants’ ad­vo­cates and ser­vice pro­vid­ers have been con­cerned that the ac­cel­er­ated pro­cess — known more for­mally as “pri­or­ity dock­ets” and in­for­mally as “surge dock­ets” or “rocket dock­ets” — would some­how com­pro­mise due pro­cess. They wor­ried that the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s ur­gency to de­port the new ar­riv­als would make it much more dif­fi­cult for the chil­dren to find af­ford­able, com­pe­tent le­gal help. They feared that in the rush, some chil­dren might not re­ceive their no­tices of court hear­ings, lead­ing to judg­ments in ab­sen­tia and guar­an­teed de­por­ta­tions.

While some of those fears have been re­al­ized around the na­tion, the ex­pe­ri­ence in New York City this week, ser­vice pro­vid­ers said, has been re­mark­ably smooth. On Wed­nes­day, the first day of the pri­or­ity dock­ets, 29 of 32 chil­dren ap­peared for ini­tial hear­ings — and one of those who failed to ap­pear had never been no­ti­fied, Legal Ser­vice pro­vid­ers said. On Thurs­day, 26 of 27 showed up. Judge Lo­prest set con­tin­u­ances for nearly all of the chil­dren in Oc­to­ber and No­vem­ber.?

Be­fore the surge of un­ac­com­pa­nied mi­nors be­came a cri­sis for the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, the im­mi­gra­tion courts in New York, among the na­tion’s bus­i­est, held four spe­cial ju­ve­nile dock­ets ev­ery month for chil­dren fac­ing de­por­ta­tion. In co­or­di­na­tion with court of­fi­cials, a co­a­li­tion of groups — in­clud­ing the Amer­i­can Im­mi­gra­tion Law­yers As­so­ci­a­tion, Cath­o­lic Char­i­ties Com­mu­nity Ser­vices, Legal Aid, Safe Pas­sage Proj­ect and The Door — pro­vided screen­ing and free le­gal rep­re­sen­ta­tion to the chil­dren.

In July, Justice Depart­ment of­fi­cials an­nounced their plan to re­shuf­fle pri­or­i­ties and to put un­ac­com­pa­nied mi­nors, as well as fam­i­lies with chil­dren, first in line to see im­mi­gra­tion judges.

United States - North America - New York - Central America - Latin America and Caribbean - Guatemala


You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here