GM to set payouts in switches crashes

Crisis might be far from over

Share with others:

Print Email Read Later

WASHINGTON -- A prominent compensation expert hired by General Motors is scheduled to announce a plan here today to distribute money to victims of accidents caused by the automaker's defective ignition switch.

But the payouts -- which could cost GM billions of dollars -- may not fully put the worst safety crisis in the company's 106-year history behind it. While many victims and their families will finally get their due, federal prosecutors and congressional investigators say GM remains in their cross hairs for possible criminal behavior related to the handling of the defective vehicles.

Efforts by GM to move beyond the ignition issue, both through the compensation plan developed by the expert, Kenneth R. Feinberg, and a recently unveiled internal investigation by the former U.S. attorney Anton R. Valukas, have done nothing to slow or redirect the criminal investigations, according to federal and state investigators, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the case.

Although the 325-page report by Mr. Valukas absolved GM's senior management and board of directors of any wrongdoing, some investigators said they put little stock in the conclusions and questioned whether the effort was truly as "unvarnished" as promised. The report, they said, provided a helpful guide to crucial names and dates in the recall controversy but otherwise had no effect on the course of their investigations.

"When you get to the part about the senior management, it sort of drops off," said Rep. Diana DeGette of Colorado, the ranking Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on oversight and investigations.

"Firing or allowing a few people to retire is certainly not enough to answer for what went wrong," Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said in an email response to questions.

Mr. Valukas, who did not respond to requests for comment, is chairman of Jenner & Block, a law firm that has represented GM in numerous matters.

The U.S. attorney's office in New York City is overseeing the criminal investigation along with the FBI, and several state attorneys general and the Securities and Exchange Commission have opened their own inquiries.

The investigators are examining a number of issues, including the role of senior management and whether GM committed fraud during its bankruptcy proceedings five years ago by not disclosing a defect that could lead to extensive future liabilities. Prosecutors are also looking into whether the company failed to comply with laws requiring timely disclosure of vehicle defects, people briefed on the matter said, and misled federal regulators about the extent of the problems.

GM has linked the faulty switch -- which can, if jostled or bumped, suddenly shut down power in a moving car -- to 13 deaths and 54 accidents. The automaker has recalled 2.6 million older Chevrolet Cobalts and other small cars with a defective ignition switch, part of the more than 20 million recalls it has made this year.

Testifying in early April on Capitol Hill about the company's decadelong delay in recalling cars known to have the defective part, GM's chief executive, Mary T. Barra, repeatedly invoked Mr. Valukas' investigation as likely to answer questions that she could not respond to at the time.

When his report was released in early June, it amounted to a harsh dressing down of GM's corporate culture, which Mr. Valukas concluded led to years of fruitless study and inaction over the safety problem. The conclusions led to the dismissal of 15 GM employees, including at least three lawyers in the general counsel's office and a corporate vice president.

The company has refused to provide names of the dismissed employees. But some of those portrayed in the report as having intimate involvement in internal discussions about the flawed switch are still working at GM.

"We still have questions about others' knowledge of the problems and why they were spared," Mr. Upton said.


You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here