Ruth Ann Dailey: The phone rings, and Peter's destiny's on the line

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

The dog days of Au­gust ha­ven’t been ter­ri­bly hot, but I still sense a gen­eral de­sire to es­cape and loll about. Or am I pro­ject­ing?

Either way, some­thing light is in or­der. So let me share with you the “Tale of the Wrong Num­ber.” Per­haps you can res­cue a star-crossed cou­ple.

Or you can laugh at my in­ep­ti­tude and feel bet­ter about your­self. Either way, the reader wins!

Early one morn­ing a cou­ple of weeks ago, the land­line rang. If it’s the land­line, it’s ei­ther my mom, a sales pitch or a po­lit­i­cal robo-call.

If the voice is fe­male and the ac­cent Texan, it’s my mom. If the ac­cent is ge­neric Amer­i­can but the tone al­most or­a­tor­i­cal, I’m go­ing to be hang­ing up on a po­lit­i­cal fund­rais­ing ap­peal.

If it’s un­in­tel­li­gi­ble, it’s a sales pitch from some aw­ful over­seas call cen­ter.

This time, the ac­cent said “call cen­ter,” but the speaker im­me­di­ately iden­ti­fied him­self as “Peter” and rushed head­long into some per­sonal, friendly chit-chat.

When he asked a ques­tion and paused for an an­swer, I said, “I’m sorry — who did you say you are?”

“Peter! From the con­fer­ence…?”

OK, I par­tic­i­pate in a non­profit group we all re­fer to as “The Con­fer­ence,” and I fig­ured it was my gen­eral grog­gi­ness at fault here, not enough caf­feine ab­sorbed yet, so I strung to­gether some non­com­mit­tal but cheer­ful words and tried to fake it till I fig­ured this out.

“It was so great to meet you,” he said.

“You, too,” I said, cast­ing my mind back through the last few months’ meet­ings to try to re­trieve a man named Peter. How had he got­ten my num­ber? Maybe the sign-in sheet?

“So what’s new with you?” he asked.

Since I thought we were talk­ing about The Con­fer­ence and thus com­mu­nity re­de­vel­op­ment, I gave him a light, brief up­date on what’s go­ing on in my neigh­bor­hood — a big prop­erty suc­cess­fully sold (al­most) and grant ap­pli­ca­tions just fin­ished.

All the while I’m still think­ing, Who the heck is this?

So I fished for in­for­ma­tion by po­litely ask­ing, “And what’s new with you?”

“Well, I’ve moved to Brook­lyn!”

“Really!” By this point the wrack­ing of my brain was so loud it drowned out what­ever ex­pla­na­tion he gave for the move.

Then he must have thrown out some kind of in­vi­ta­tion — I’m not sure be­cause, again, the chaos in my syn­apses was over­whelm­ing — but what­ever kind of open-ended feeler it was, I failed to no­tice and re­spond.

Peter’s voice took on a muted tone — a lit­tle hurt and per­plexed but still gamely try­ing. “Well, it was re­ally great to meet you at the con­fer­ence, Katie —”

Katie! What?

“ — and (some­thing some­thing) —” He said good­bye and hung up while I was still reg­is­ter­ing that he thought I was some­one else.

He hadn’t met me at The Con­fer­ence, he’d met Katie at a con­fer­ence, and he’s try­ing to re­con­nect, and I’m such an id­iot that I’ve ended a bud­ding ro­mance!

Now the caf­feine was kick­ing in. I’d call him back and ex­plain — some­how with­out blam­ing his non-na­tive ac­cent — why it had taken me so long to re­al­ize he’d reached a wrong num­ber.

I di­aled *69 tri­um­phantly, but alas! His phone blocks re­verse call­ing.

How could I pos­si­bly fix this? How could I not have un­der­stood? Well, be­sides the ac­cent, there was the gen­eral em­bar­rass­ment — well-known to me — of for­get­ting peo­ple’s names al­most as soon as I’ve met them.

Maybe he’d try again in a cou­ple of weeks — he sounded like the plucky sort — and would dial the cor­rect num­ber and Katie would be thrilled to hear from him.

They’d meet for din­ner, and he’d say he had been wor­ried that she wasn’t in­ter­ested be­cause she was so stand-off­ish dur­ing their first call, and she’d say, “What first call?”

Then they’d get the whole wrong-num­ber thing and laugh about a be­wil­dered mid­dle-aged lady some­where still try­ing to fig­ure out who Peter is.

Maybe he di­aled just one wrong digit. I could try all the pos­si­bil­i­ties. 212-322-…, 312-322-… What is that — 90 pos­si­ble num­bers? A mil­lion?

I can no lon­ger do such math.

In fact, maybe Katie gave him a wrong num­ber on pur­pose, and I’ve ac­ci­den­tally done her a fa­vor.

If you know a Katie in Pitts­burgh who re­cently at­tended a con­fer­ence, you might ask her or just laugh at my pre­dic­a­ment. Any­thing to while away a few of sum­mer’s wan­ing min­utes.


Ruth Ann Dai­ley: ruth­an­n­dai­ley@hot­mail.com

Join the conversation:

Commenting policy | How to report abuse
To report inappropriate comments, abuse and/or repeat offenders, please send an email to socialmedia@post-gazette.com and include a link to the article and a copy of the comment. Your report will be reviewed in a timely manner. Thank you.
Commenting policy | How to report abuse

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here