Mark Critz never responded to our questions about gun issues

Share with others:

Print Email Read Later

We read with confusion and disappointment the Post-Gazette’s endorsement of Mark Critz for lieutenant governor (“Lt. Governor: Critz Is Best for the Democratic Ticket,” May 4). The editorial board acknowledges that lieutenant governor candidates generally distinguish themselves on the issues. But then the paper ignores a key issue in this election — gun violence prevention.

Mr. Critz was one of three candidates who failed to even respond to a questionnaire by CeaseFire Pennsylvania on this issue. By contrast, the three responding candidates — Mike Stack, Mark Smith and Brad Koplinski — each unequivocally supported every proposal presented, including expanding background checks, mandatory lost and stolen reporting and child access prevention laws.

Gun violence prevention is an issue that Pittsburgh and this paper in particular have identified as a key problem, the solutions to which impact our communities — emotionally, health-wise and morally — and our economy. Lieutenant governor is an important position — No. 2 behind the governor and tie-breaker in the Senate. Surely, there should be a thorough discussion of the critical issues facing our state when the city’s key newspaper endorses a candidate for the second-highest position in our government.

Mt. Lebanon

West Mifflin

The writers are board members of CeaseFire Pennsylvania, a gun violence prevention organization.

Join the conversation:

Commenting policy | How to report abuse
To report inappropriate comments, abuse and/or repeat offenders, please send an email to and include a link to the article and a copy of the comment. Your report will be reviewed in a timely manner. Thank you.
Commenting policy | How to report abuse


Create a free PG account.
Already have an account?