A fitting tribute

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

Regarding the letter “Don’t Honor Frick” (Jan. 31): The fundamental reason that Frick Park is rightly named for Henry Clay Frick, and not Dr. Jonas Salk, is that Frick donated it to the city. Letter writer Nick Coxon’s devaluation of Frick’s achievements — instrumental in the rise of the Carnegie Steel Company and the creation of U.S. Steel — is unwarranted and entirely derived from the false Marxist idea that capitalists merely siphon off the “surplus value” of labor to enrich themselves.

Such faulty reasoning ignores the fact that, were it not for capitalists like Frick and Andrew Carnegie, there would have been no plant and hence no need for laborers, let alone reason for the initiation of the violent and armed occupation of the plant which turned deadly.

As an infectious disease physician, I honor the achievements of Dr. Salk but realize that Henry Frick is unequivocally worthy of emulation and honor as well.

AMESH ADALJA, M.D.
Butler

 


Join the conversation:

Commenting policy | How to report abuse
To report inappropriate comments, abuse and/or repeat offenders, please send an email to socialmedia@post-gazette.com and include a link to the article and a copy of the comment. Your report will be reviewed in a timely manner. Thank you.
Commenting policy | How to report abuse

Advertisement

Latest in Letters

Frack pit hazards
about 13 hours ago
Right-wing reform?
about 13 hours ago
More postal woes
about 13 hours ago
Pitfall for UPMC
about 13 hours ago
Easter close call
about 13 hours ago
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here