Designed to kill

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

As a gun owner and hunter for more than 55 years, I have long opposed the sale or ownership of assault-style weapons and extended magazines. They have no legitimate purpose in field or forest and no one needs them for self-defense.

As a Vietnam veteran who has carried and fired an M-16 and have had an AK-47 fired at me, I know what these weapons are designed for and what they can do. The often-used and specious argument that the civilian models, such as the Bushmaster, are semi-auto rather than full auto, somehow making them less deadly, is ridiculous. Anyone can easily fire a 30-round magazine at better than one round per second with these semi-automatic man killers.

For the record, I am not a National Rifle Association member, never have been, and am diametrically opposed to virtually everything for which it stands. I know many other hunters who feel the same way. Finally, let me clearly state I am not afraid my government is going to take away my hunting rifles and shotguns.

WILLIAM J. CAMMARATA
Sewickley


opinion_letters


Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here