Leader of the Other 'United States' Urges Changing Mexico's Name

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

MEXICO CITY -- With just over a week left in office, the president of Mexico has offered perhaps the boldest proposal of his six-year tenure. He wants Mexico to just be "Mexico."

The formal name of the country is Estados Unidos Mexicanos, often translated as "United Mexican States" or "United States of Mexico."

It is the "Estados Unidos" that nags at President Felipe de Jesús Calderón Hinojosa (called just "Lipe" by some) and he wants it out once and for all. It happens to be the Spanish name of the big neighbor up north, and that is no accident.

Mexico was christened with the longer formal name in the early 19th century after independence from Spain, inspired by the democratic example next door. Other names considered at the time, noted Mr. Calderón, a fan of history, were Mexican Empire and Republic of Mexico ("México" is derived from the Nahuatl word for the region).

Now it is time, he said, for Mexico to step out of the shadow of the United States, at least in name.

"Mexico does not need a name that emulates another country and that none of us Mexicans use every day," he said Thursday at a morning announcement at the presidential residence.

"Mexico is the name that corresponds to the essence of our nation. Pardon the expression, but the name of Mexico is Mexico."

Making it so, however, will take a constitutional change.

With Mr. Calderón leaving office on Dec. 1, the prospects seemed uncertain; his office did not respond to questions on why he proposed the shift only now.

Associates have said he is looking for work in the United States after he leaves office, but Mr. Calderón is not known to particularly love the country and never shies from using it as a political whipping boy. He chose to make his announcement as the United States of America celebrated Thanksgiving Day.

Still, it is not an entirely new idea. Such a name change has been proposed occasionally in the past but without getting very far.

"With so many real problems in this country, I don't think that it matters," said Enrique Krauze, a leading historian and political analyst. "No one ever calls Mexico anything other than Mexico."

Opposition lawmakers, too, shrugged at the idea, with some viewing it as the early onset of Mr. Calderón's post-presidency blues.

"He is not prepared to leave power," said Iris Vianey Mendoza, a senator with the leftist Party of the Democratic Revolution. "The problem is not that our name emulates that of the American government but that we don't fight our subordinate relationship to it."

Mr. Calderón's proposal likewise got a mixed reaction of derision, acceptance and some practical questions on social media.

One user on Twitter, Ángel Quintanilla, did the math in heavily bureaucratic Mexico and wrote, "I don't think @FelipeCalderón even considered the cost and hassle that changing every law and official document entails."

Karla Zabludovsky contributed reporting.

world

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.


Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here