Bank of America nearing landmark probe settlement

Justice’s deal with bank over mortgages could reach $17B

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

WASHINGTON — Bank of Amer­ica is near­ing a $16 bil­lion to $17 bil­lion set­tle­ment to re­solve an in­ves­ti­ga­tion into its role in the sale of mort­gage-backed se­cu­ri­ties be­fore the 2008 fi­nan­cial cri­sis, a per­son di­rectly fa­mil­iar with the mat­ter said Wed­nes­day.

The deal with the bank, which must still be fi­nal­ized, would be the larg­est Justice Depart­ment set­tle­ment by far aris­ing from the eco­nomic melt­down, in which mil­lions of Amer­i­cans lost their homes to fore­clo­sure. It would fol­low ear­lier mul­ti­bil­lion-dol­lar agree­ments reached in the last year with Cit­i­group and JPMor­gan Chase & Co.

The per­son, who spoke on con­di­tion of an­o­nym­ity be­cause the deal had not yet been an­nounced, cau­tioned that some de­tails still needed to be worked out, and that it was pos­si­ble that the agree­ment could fall apart. But the per­son said the two sides reached an agree­ment in prin­ci­ple fol­low­ing a con­ver­sa­tion last week be­tween At­tor­ney Gen­eral Eric Holder and Brian Moyni­han, Bank of Amer­ica CEO.

The per­son said the ten­ta­tive deal calls for the bank to pay roughly $9 bil­lion in cash, and for the re­main­ing sum to go to­ward con­sumer re­lief. A bank spokes­man de­clined to com­ment. The Wall Street Jour­nal first re­ported de­tails of the set­tle­ment Wed­nes­day.

The deal would be the lat­est aris­ing from the sale of toxic mort­gage se­cu­ri­ties lead­ing up to the re­ces­sion. The Justice Depart­ment last year reached a $13 bil­lion set­tle­ment with JPMor­gan, and in July, it an­nounced a $7 bil­lion set­tle­ment with Cit­i­group.

Each of these deals is de­signed to of­fer some re­lief to home­own­ers, whose mort­gages were bun­dled into se­cu­ri­ties by the banks in ques­tion and then sold to in­ves­tors. When the hous­ing mar­ket col­lapsed, the poor qual­ity of the loans led to huge losses for in­ves­tors and a slew of fore­clo­sures, kick­ing off the re­ces­sion that be­gan in late 2007.

Yet the cash to­tals from some of Amer­ica’s larg­est banks are not nearly enough to re­verse the dam­ages caused by the burst­ing of the hous­ing bub­ble and the en­su­ing re­ces­sion. Mil­lions of Amer­i­cans lost their homes in fore­clo­sures and found them­selves job­less in the worst down­turn since the 1930s. Even as the un­em­ploy­ment rate has clawed back to 6.2 per­cent from a peak of 10 per­cent, many peo­ple are no bet­ter off, as av­er­age house­hold in­comes af­ter in­fla­tion are still lower than what they were seven years ago.

Con­sumer groups have crit­i­cized past set­tle­ments for be­ing soft on the banks and for an ap­par­ent lack of trans­par­ency.

The set­tle­ments stem from the sale of toxic se­cu­ri­ties made up of sub­prime mort­gages. Banks played down the risks of sub­prime mort­gages when pack­ag­ing and sell­ing the se­cu­ri­ties to mu­tual funds, in­vest­ment trusts and pen­sions, as well as other banks and in­ves­tors.

United States government - Eric Holder - Bank of America Corporation - JPMorgan Chase & Co - Fannie Mae - Brian Moynihan


Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here