Man acquitted of inappropriate conduct

Relatives pushed claims of touching

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

An oil and gas ex­ec­u­tive was found not guilty Tues­day of charges he in­ap­pro­pri­ately touched two fe­male rel­a­tives while they were chil­dren.

David Kozel, 49, for­merly of Pine, had a non­jury trial be­fore Com­mon Pleas Judge Donna Jo McDaniel on charges in­clud­ing ag­gra­vated in­de­cent as­sault, un­law­ful con­tact, cor­rup­tion of mi­nors and en­dan­ger­ing the wel­fare of chil­dren dat­ing back a de­cade.

At the time of his ar­rest last sum­mer, Mr. Kozel was semi­re­tired as vice pres­i­dent of Texas Key­stone Inc., an oil and gas ex­plo­ration firm.

Dur­ing the one-day trial, the pros­e­cu­tion called only the two al­leged vic­tims to tes­tify. They are now 17 and 19 years old. The Post-Ga­zette does not name al­leged vic­tims of sex­ual as­sault.

The young women said that Mr. Kozel in­ap­pro­pri­ately touched them while they bathed when they vis­ited, and that he also touched them in their beds. They last vis­ited him in 2006.

The al­leged vic­tims did not re­port what they claimed was hap­pen­ing un­til Jan­u­ary 2013.

“I was re­ally con­fused,” the older teen tes­ti­fied. “I just felt less than hu­man, I guess.

“I was afraid. I thought he was go­ing to hurt my fam­ily.”

Dur­ing cross-ex­ami­na­tion by de­fense at­tor­ney Wil­liam Difen­d­er­fer, the wit­ness said she didn’‍t tell be­cause what hap­pened was shame­ful.

“So these vis­its had to be ab­so­lutely hor­ri­ble,” Mr. Difen­d­er­fer said.

“Yes, sir,” the older teen said.

But Deanna Kozel, who lived with Mr. Kozel dur­ing the time frame of the al­leged abuse, said there was no abuse.

“Did you ever find David in their room?” asked de­fense at­tor­ney Tina O. Miller.

“Never,” the wit­ness an­swered. “It never hap­pened.”

Deanna Kozel, who di­vorced Mr. Kozel in 2010 and is not re­lated to the al­leged vic­tims, said that she was with the girls and Mr. Kozel al­most all the time dur­ing the vis­its and that she never saw him act in­ap­pro­pri­ately with them. Fur­ther, she said she was the one re­spon­si­ble for bath­ing them.

In reach­ing her ver­dict, Judge McDaniel said the in­con­sis­tency in the time­line of when the girls re­ported the al­leged abuse raised rea­son­able doubt.


Paula Reed Ward: pward@post-ga­zette.com, 412-263-2620 or on Twit­ter: @Pau­laReedWard. First Published July 22, 2014 12:00 AM


Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here