
 Gas competition can be a pipeline to savings
By Ken Zapinski, Post-Gazette Staff Writer
It was supposed to be a simple experiment for 4,000 households in the
South Hills suburb of Pleasant Hills. Instead, it turned into a gas explosion.
In the fall of 1995, Equitable Resources Inc. suggested that Pleasant
Hills residents be allowed to break with decades of regulatory practice and choose their
own utility suppliers. For a two-year test period, they would be the states guinea
pigs, testing out the forces of utility deregulation.
But events quickly outran that modest plan.
Peoples Natural Gas Co. last year decided to allow all of its 348,000
Western Pennsylvania customers to choose new suppliers if they wished. Columbia Gas of
Pennsylvania launched its own choice program, first in Washington County, then in
Allegheny County, and finally in Beaver, Butler and three other counties last month.
Even Equitable got moving, releasing the 233,500 residential customers
on its Western Pennsylvania system to shop for asupplier.
In all, some 750,000 Pittsburgh-area residential and small business
customers now have the opportunity that big business customers have enjoyed for years
the chance to save money by shopping for a cheaper gas supplier.
Here's how it works.
Roughly half your monthly gas bill is for the actual methane that you
burn in your stove, your water heater, your furnace, maybe even your clothes dryer. The
other half is for bringing the gas from the well to your doorstep and for maintaining the
underground pipeline system.
Customers in choice programs have the option of shopping for someone who
will sell them the natural gas for less than the rate charged by their current utility.
Reliability isn't an issue; the customers will remain tied to their local utility, which
will continue to charge them for delivering the outside suppliers' gas each month.
What consumers must decide is whether the hassles of shopping are worth
five or 10 bucks a month in savings.
Equitable officials compare it to buying a cake.
If you want a cake, you can purchase one from a bakery. Or you can
purchase the ingredients separately and put it together yourself. Baking your own may save
money, but it takes effort. Same with shopping for natural gas.
"You may decide it's too much time and effort, and that's your
choice," one Equitable customer service official said.
The utilities say they dont worry about losing gas sales.
Utilities make their money based on their investment in gas lines, meters and other
equipment. Customers will continue to pay for those items even if they switch suppliers.
But utility companies are forbidden from making a dime on the gas they sell. That cost is
passed along to customers, dollar for dollar, according to a formula set by the PUC. And
that doesnt give utilities any incentive to be aggressive in purchasing their gas
supplies.
Outside suppliers, unbound by those PUC rules, on the other hand,
operate like any other business. They try to buy gas at a low price, resell it to
customers at a higher one and pocket the difference. The trick is for the suppliers to buy
gas cheaply enough so they can sell it for a discounted price and still make a profit.
Consumers already have an advantage in this game thanks to a a tax
loophole that for once, works for the little guy. Customers who use outside suppliers do
not have to pay the state's 5 percent gross receipts tax on their monthly bills.
The loophole has been crucial, because program savings have been
relatively modest. Columbia Gas said its customers saved about $8 a month last winter. But
$5 of that was from not having to pay taxes.
Without the tax loophole, a typical Equitable customer would only save
about $1.50 a month less than $20 a year by switching suppliers, according
to company figures.
Those savings have not been big enough to stir up consumers. In the
Columbia program, barely one in four customers eligible have signed up. The enrollment
rate in the 18-month-old Peoples Natural Gas program is about the same. Since Equitable
customers were allowed to switch six months ago, about 17 percent have done so.
Suppliers have complained that it is difficult for them to make money
because of the way Peoples and Equitable have set up their programs. The companies deny
that.
At issue is the interstate pipeline capacity that utilities use to bring
gas to Pittsburgh from gas fields in Louisiana or Appalachia. The utilities signed
capacity contracts back when they were supplying all their customers. Now that they
dont have to supply so many customers, they dont need as much capacity.
Peoples and Equitable have set up their programs so that, in essence,
when an outside supplier snags a customer, it must also absorb the pipeline costs
associated with that customer. The suppliers say this limits their flexibility and makes
it tough for them to sell their gas at a low enough price to attract customers.
Columbia's program is somewhat different, with all customers sharing
pipeline costs, industry experts said. That has made it more attractive to suppliers.
Columbia residential customers have had a choice of 10 outside suppliers. In contrast,
only three residential suppliers are approved to deal on the Equitable and Peoples
systems, and not all of them are selling anything.
The pipeline issue has helped stall efforts to write legislation that
would bring natural gas choice to all Pennsylvania customers. Another hang-up in
Harrisburg: the Ridge Administration wants to tighten the gross-receipts tax loophole.
That ultimately could trim the savings already enjoyed by Pittsburgh-area customers.
|