Workzone: Are heavier employees more likely to be passed over for jobs?

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

James Zer­vios re­counts the story of a woman who was told she needed to lose weight to keep her job. She was a flight at­ten­dant who couldn’t buckle the seat belt on the plane’‍s jump seat.

“She was told if she did not lose enough weight to buckle the seat belt with­out a seat belt ex­tender, then she would be ter­mi­nated,” Mr. Zer­vios said.

As di­rec­tor of com­mu­ni­ca­tions for the Obe­s­ity Ac­tion Co­a­li­tion, a non­profit or­ga­ni­za­tion based in Tampa, Fla., Mr. Zer­vios deals with weight-based dis­crim­i­na­tion a lot. He has worked with peo­ple who claim they weren’t pro­moted be­cause of their weight. Others al­lege they were fired be­cause of their in­abil­ity to per­form cer­tain tasks. About once a month, he’‍ll get a call from some­one who has been stig­ma­tized at work be­cause of their weight.

“Un­for­tu­nately, weight bias is alive and well,” Mr. Zer­vios said.

Re­search sup­ports that con­clu­sion. Heavier em­ploy­ees are more likely to lose their jobs or be passed over for po­si­tions than their thin­ner coun­ter­parts, ac­cord­ing to the Rudd Center for Food Pol­icy & Obe­s­ity at Yale Univer­sity.

“I think what’s safe to con­clude is that weight dis­crim­i­na­tion oc­curs at ev­ery stage of the em­ploy­ment cy­cle from get­ting hired to get­ting fired,” said Rebecca Puhl, dep­uty di­rec­tor at the Rudd Center. “What we see in ex­per­i­men­tal stud­ies, for ex­am­ple, is that hir­ing pro­fes­sion­als are less likely to hire an over­weight can­di­date as op­posed to a thin­ner can­di­date with the ex­act same qual­i­fi­ca­tions.”

In fact, she added, an em­ployer would rather hire a thin per­son who is less qual­i­fied for a po­si­tion than an over­weight per­son who is more qual­i­fied, es­pe­cially for jobs where a lot of so­cial in­ter­ac­tion with cli­ents is ex­pected.

A 2008 Rudd Center study of more than 2,800 Amer­i­cans found over­weight adults were 12 times more likely to re­port hav­ing ex­pe­ri­enced weight-based em­ploy­ment dis­crim­i­na­tion than thin­ner per­sons. Of the study’‍s par­tic­i­pants, 60 per­cent ex­pe­ri­enced at least one oc­cur­rence of em­ploy­ment-based dis­crim­i­na­tion due to weight is­sues.

More than one-third of Amer­i­can adults are obese, ac­cord­ing to the Center for Dis­ease Con­trol and Preven­tion.

Some ex­perts be­lieve dis­crim­i­na­tion on the ba­sis of weight stems from ide­al­is­tic beauty stan­dards. “In gen­eral, more at­trac­tive peo­ple are viewed as hav­ing a num­ber of pos­i­tive traits, which re­flects em­ploy­ment de­ci­sions,” said Mark Roeh­ling, a pro­fes­sor at the School of Human Re­sources and La­bor Re­sources at Mich­i­gan State Univer­sity.

Others be­lieve weight-re­lated in­ci­dents can hap­pen to any­one, even those who don’t fit the typ­i­cal over­weight cri­te­rion.

“A per­son does not need to have an ex­tremely high body-mass in­dex to ex­pe­ri­ence dis­crim­i­na­tion and bias. Even those who aren't obese are be­ing teased about their weight,” Ms. Puhl said. “Cer­tainly, they’re much less likely to ex­pe­ri­ence bias and stigma than a per­son who is over­weight, but it doesn’t make them im­mune.”

There are few le­gal op­tions avail­able in these cases. A state law against weight-based dis­crim­i­na­tion has been passed in Mich­i­gan. Other sim­i­lar mea­sures have passed in cit­ies such as San Fran­cisco.

But cur­rently there are no fed­eral laws pre­vent­ing the prac­tice, which might be a rea­son it is of­ten over­looked, Ms. Puhl said. “Be­cause there is no le­gal re­course, peo­ple don’‍t come for­ward,” she said.

Some ex­perts think em­ploy­ers should do more to ad­dress the is­sue, but oth­ers ar­gue they could cause more dam­age than good.

“We no­tice em­ploy­ers will im­ple­ment some type of plan they think will ad­dress the is­sue, but in re­al­ity it stig­ma­tizes those who are over­weight or obese. We’ve seen cases where com­pa­nies would place a mon­e­tary pen­alty against some­one who’s BMI fell in the obe­sity range,” Mr. Zer­vios said. “Ba­si­cally, the em­ployer pe­nal­izes em­ploy­ees who have obe­sity and yet do not of­fer any type of ef­fec­tive work­place well­ness pro­gram.”

The Obe­s­ity Ac­tion Co­a­li­tion of­fers a weight bias guide for those try­ing to stop weight-based dis­crim­i­na­tion in their work­place that of­fers sug­ges­tions on how to im­prove work­ing con­di­tions for such in­di­vid­u­als. Ideas in­clude cre­at­ing a sup­port­ive en­vi­ron­ment and set­ting re­al­is­tic, at­tain­able weight goals.


Madasyn Cze­bi­n­iak: mc­ze­bi­n­iak@post-ga­zette.com or 412-263-1269. Twit­ter: @PG_C­ze­bi­n­iak.

Join the conversation:

Commenting policy | How to report abuse
To report inappropriate comments, abuse and/or repeat offenders, please send an email to socialmedia@post-gazette.com and include a link to the article and a copy of the comment. Your report will be reviewed in a timely manner. Thank you.
Commenting policy | How to report abuse

Advertisement

Latest in People on the Move

Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here