Sunday, July 27, 2025, 6:10AM | 
MENU
Advertisement
FILE - In this March 22, 2012, file photo,President Barack Obama arriving at the TransCanada Stillwater Pipe Yard in Cushing, Okla. For six and a half years, the White House has had a quick comeback to questions about its yet-to-be-announced decision on the proposed Keystone XL pipeline: Talk to the State Department. Under a President George W. Bush-era executive order, border-crossing oil pipelines require a presidential permit, granted only after a government-wide review coordinated by the State Department. An Associated Press review of every cross-border pipeline application since 2004 shows that the Keystone review has been anything but ordinary.  (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)
7
MORE

Keystone XL: US review taking 5 times longer than average

Pablo Martinez Monsivais

Keystone XL: US review taking 5 times longer than average

Obama administration review of Keystone XL pipeline permit taking 5 times longer than average

WASHINGTON (AP) — The federal review of the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada to Texas has dragged on for nearly seven years, more than five times the average for such applications.

The White House insists it’s simply following a standard and well-established process.

In the 6 1/2 years since TransCanada Corp. first applied for a permit, the $8 billion project has become a flashpoint in the debate over climate change.

Advertisement

Under a George W. Bush-era executive order, oil pipelines crossing U.S. borders require a presidential permit, setting off a government-wide review coordinated by the State Department.

An Associated Press examination of every cross-border pipeline application since 2004, when Bush revised the process, shows that the Keystone review has been anything but ordinary.

Since April 2004, when Bush signed his order, the government has taken an average of 478 days — less than a year and a half — to approve or reject all other applications. TransCanada has waited nearly seven years for a ruling.

Former Bush White House officials who helped develop the policy say it was never intended that the final decision about a presidential permit would be delegated to a Cabinet department. The revamped process was intended to quicken permits for major public works projects, those officials said.

Advertisement

Approving a pipeline permit “was seen as the most routine, boring thing in the world,” Robert McNally, who was an energy adviser to Bush.

Republicans and energy advocates have pressed Obama to approve the project, which environmentalists say would promote dirty tar sands oil and risk spills.

The company first applied in September 2008 for a permit to build the 1,179-mile pipeline, which would connect Canada’s tar sands with crude oil refineries on the Texas Gulf Coast.

Controversy over the proposed route through Nebraska led to a tweak, which led the State Department to revisit its assessment. When Congress in 2012 gave Obama a deadline to make a decision, he rejected the permit on grounds he didn’t have enough time to thoroughly review it. He allowed TransCanada Corp. to reapply.

The administration has declined to say what’s taking so long or to offer insight into the deliberations.

“This is under a review process at the State Department. That particular process is a process that predates this administration, so I’m not going to have any update for you from here,” White House spokesman Eric Schultz told reporters recently. He did promise a decision sometime before Obama leaves office in January 2017.

Under Bush’s executive order, the State Department receives permit applications and circulates them to agencies such as the Commerce Department, Energy Department and the Environmental Protection Agency. The agencies have 90 days to offer opinions. If the State Department decides to grant approval, it notifies other agencies, which have 15 days to object before a permit is issued.

The final call comes down to whether the project serves the nation’s interest. In a climate change speech in 2013, Obama established a litmus test: Keystone wouldn’t move forward if it would significantly increase greenhouse gas emissions. That’s a hotly contested matter.

More than 16 months have passed since the State Department’s 30-day public comment period ended. The State Department has not disclosed whether any agencies have objected to the pipeline. The department has said it is continuing to review the application “in a rigorous, transparent, and objective manner.”

The process does not typically drag on this long.

The first permit issued after Bush revised the process in 2004 took less than four months from application to signature. Express Pipeline, L.L.C., was expanding a 785-mile pipeline crossing the Canadian border from Hardisty, Alberta, the same town where the proposed Keystone XL would start.

Even the pipeline that took the longest to approve — the 435-mile Vantage Pipeline Project, approved during Obama’s tenure — took fewer than three years, despite requiring complex negotiations with Native American tribes concerned about historical preservation.

The 1,000-mile Alberta Clipper Project, which drew legal challenges from Earthjustice and other groups, took 25 months to approve.

“When we brought the Alberta Clipper suit, nobody was really paying attention to pipelines,” said Sarah Burt, an Earthjustice attorney. “It hadn’t become this big bargaining chip, this symbolic ask of the administration that Keystone became.”

Not including Keystone XL, eight applications for new or significantly upgraded petroleum pipelines have been processed since April 2004.

The AP’s review excluded permits reissued for existing pipelines due to change of ownership. To come up with an average processing time, the AP culled data from the Federal Register, State Department records, congressional correspondence, Congressional Research Service reports and data provided by pipeline owners.

Reach Josh Lederman on Twitter at http://twitter.com/joshledermanAP

First Published: August 12, 2015, 6:43 p.m.

RELATED
SHOW COMMENTS (0)  
Join the Conversation
Commenting policy | How to Report Abuse
If you would like your comment to be considered for a published letter to the editor, please send it to letters@post-gazette.com. Letters must be under 250 words and may be edited for length and clarity.
Partners
Advertisement
A huge Canadian flag carried by a crowd in Montreal in 1995, before a referendum on Quecec’s independence. Dennis Jett suggests Pennsylvania do the same in reverse.
1
opinion
Dennis Jett: Pennsylvania should become part of Canada
New cornerback Jalen Ramsey (5) gets into position prior to a play during practice on the first day of Steelers Training Camp at Saint Vincent College in Latrobe Thursday, July 24, 2025.
2
sports
Steelers training camp observations: Jalen Ramsey-led defense comes out 'aggressive and angry'
There is a large covered porch at the front of the house at 115 Forest Hills Road in Forest Hills.
3
life
Buying Here: Forest Hills home in its own 'mini-forest' listed for $425,000
Several houses are shown along N. Dallas Avenue near Penn Avenue in Point Breeze with “For Sale” signs in the front yard, Friday, March 21, 2025.
4
business
A cooling market and patient buyers are causing many Pittsburgh home sellers to cut their prices
Pittsburgh Pirates starting pitcher Mitch Keller throws during the first inning of a baseball game against the Kansas City Royals, Tuesday, July 8, 2025, in Kansas City, Mo.
5
sports
Off The Bat: Mitch Keller's Pirates tenure wasn't supposed to go like this
FILE - In this March 22, 2012, file photo,President Barack Obama arriving at the TransCanada Stillwater Pipe Yard in Cushing, Okla. For six and a half years, the White House has had a quick comeback to questions about its yet-to-be-announced decision on the proposed Keystone XL pipeline: Talk to the State Department. Under a President George W. Bush-era executive order, border-crossing oil pipelines require a presidential permit, granted only after a government-wide review coordinated by the State Department. An Associated Press review of every cross-border pipeline application since 2004 shows that the Keystone review has been anything but ordinary. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)  (Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
FILE- In this Feb. 24, 2015, file photo, Danny Ruthenberg-Marshall, left, with 350 DC, and Lindsey Halvorson, a student at American University, pick up their signs after attending gathering with other opponents of Keystone XL oil pipeline in support of a veto of the legislation outside the White House in Washington. An Associated Press review of every cross-border pipeline application since 2004 shows that the Keystone review has been anything but ordinary. The company hoping to build Keystone has been waiting for a decision for nearly 7 years — or more than five times the average. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File)  (Jacquelyn Martin)
FILE - In this Feb. 24, 2015, file photo, Melinda Pierce, center, with the Sierra Club, holds a "No KXL" sign, next to a large poster of a pen as she gathers with other opponents of Keystone XL oil pipeline to celebrate President Barack Obama's veto of the legislation outside the White House in Washington. For six and a half years, the White House has had a quick comeback to questions about its yet-to-be-announced decision on the proposed Keystone XL pipeline: Talk to the State Department. Under a President George W. Bush-era executive order, border-crossing oil pipelines require a presidential permit, granted only after a government-wide review coordinated by the State Department. An Associated Press review of every cross-border pipeline application since 2004 shows that the Keystone review has been anything but ordinary. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File)  (Jacquelyn Martin)
FILE - In this Feb. 1, 2012 file photo, miles of pipe for the stalled Canada-to-Texas Keystone XL pipeline are stacked in a field near Ripley, Okla. An Associated Press review of every cross-border pipeline application since 2004 shows that the Keystone review has been anything but ordinary. The company hoping to build Keystone has been waiting for a decision for nearly 7 years — or more than five times the average. (AP Photo/Sue Ogrocki, File)  (Sue Ogrocki)
FILE - This May 24, 2012m file photo shows some of about 500 miles worth of coated steel pipe manufactured by Welspun Pipes, Inc., originally for the Keystone oil pipeline, stored in Little Rock, Ark. For six and a half years, the White House has had a quick comeback to questions about its yet-to-be-announced decision on the proposed Keystone XL pipeline: Talk to the State Department. Under a President George W. Bush-era executive order, border-crossing oil pipelines require a presidential permit, granted only after a government-wide review coordinated by the State Department. An Associated Press review of every cross-border pipeline application since 2004 shows that the Keystone review has been anything but ordinary. (AP Photo/Danny Johnston, File)  (Danny Johnston)
FILE - In this Feb. 13, 2015, file photo, House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio signs the bill authorizing expansion of the Keystone XL pipeline on Capitol Hill in Washington. For six and a half years, the White House has had a quick comeback to questions about its yet-to-be-announced decision on the proposed Keystone XL pipeline: Talk to the State Department. Under a President George W. Bush-era executive order, border-crossing oil pipelines require a presidential permit, granted only after a government-wide review coordinated by the State Department. An Associated Press review of every cross-border pipeline application since 2004 shows that the Keystone review has been anything but ordinary. Senate sponsor of the Keystone XL pipeline bill, Boehner, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy of Calif., Rep. Kristi Noem, R-S.D., Rep. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., and House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)  (AP)
FILE - This March 11, 2013, file photo shows a sign reading "Stop the Transcanada Pipeline" in a field near Bradshaw, Neb. For six and a half years, the White House has had a quick comeback to questions about its yet-to-be-announced decision on the proposed Keystone XL pipeline: Talk to the State Department. Under a President George W. Bush-era executive order, border-crossing oil pipelines require a presidential permit, granted only after a government-wide review coordinated by the State Department. An Associated Press review of every cross-border pipeline application since 2004 shows that the Keystone review has been anything but ordinary. (AP Photo/Nati Harnik, File)  (NH)
Pablo Martinez Monsivais
Advertisement
LATEST powersource
Advertisement
TOP
Email a Story