Obama administration looks at major nuclear arms cut
Share with others:
WASHINGTON -- Senior Obama administration officials have agreed that the number of nuclear warheads the U.S. military deploys could be cut by at least a third without harming national security, according to those involved in the deliberations.
Such a reduction would open the door to billions of dollars in military savings, which might ease the federal budget deficit. It also would improve prospects for a new arms deal with Russia before President Barack Obama leaves office, those involved said, but it is likely to draw fire from conservatives, if previous debate on the issue is any guide.
The results of the internal review have not been announced, but they are reflected in a proposed classified directive prepared for Mr. Obama's signature that details how U.S. nuclear weapons should be targeted against potential foes, according to four people with direct knowledge of the document's content. The sources, who spoke only on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to talk to a reporter about the review, described the president as fully on board but said he hasn't signed the document.
The document directs the first detailed Pentagon revisions in U.S. targeting since 2009, when the military's nuclear war planners last took account for the substantial shrinkage -- roughly by half from 2000 to 2008 -- in the number of nuclear weapons in the American arsenal. It makes clear that an even smaller nuclear force can still meet all defense requirements.
The officials said Mr. Obama's advisers had reached their consensus position last year, after a review that included the State Department, the Defense Department, the National Security Council, the intelligence community, the U.S. Strategic Command, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the office of Vice President Joe Biden.
Participants said the results were not disclosed at the time, partly because of concerns that any resulting controversy might affect Mr. Obama's re-election hopes. Some Republican lawmakers have said they oppose cutting the arsenal out of concern that it might diminish America's standing in the world.
Under the new policy, the United States would target fewer, but more important, military or political sites in Russia, China and several other countries.
Mr. Obama first adopted a policy to reduce the role of nuclear weapons in 2010, explaining in a Defense Department report that they're "poorly suited to address the challenges posed by suicidal terrorists and unfriendly regimes seeking nuclear weapons."
Much of the policy has yet to be implemented, but with the election behind him and a new national security team selected, Mr. Obama finally is prepared to send this new guidance to the Joint Chiefs of Staff and to open a new dialogue with Russia about corresponding reductions in deployed weapons, according to two senior U.S. officials involved in the deliberations.
One of the officials said the review's conclusions very likely would become public in coming weeks, possibly during the president's State of the Union address Tuesday night or in a speech this spring dedicated to the subject.
While the draft directive opens the door to scrapping a substantial portion of the U.S. arsenal, it doesn't order those reductions immediately or suggest that they be undertaken unilaterally, the officials said. Instead, the administration hopes to negotiate an addendum to the 2010 New START treaty with Russia, in the form of a legally binding agreement or an informal understanding. Officials said the latter path might be chosen if gaining the assent of two-thirds of the Senate to a treaty weren't possible.
Preliminary discussions about such an addendum occurred Feb. 2 in Munich between Mr. Biden and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. Additional talks are expected later this month, when acting Undersecretary of State Rose Gottemoeller and White House national security adviser Thomas Donilon visit Moscow.
Under the new deal envisioned by the administration, Russia and the United States would agree not only to cut deployed warhead levels below 1,550 -- to between 1,000 and 1,100 -- but also, for the first time, to begin limiting the number of tactical weapons as well. Several officials said that, as a result, the total number of U.S. nuclear warheads could shrink to fewer than 3,500 and perhaps as low as 2,500, or a bit more than half the present arsenal, without harming security or requiring a major reconfiguration of missiles or bombers.
The financial savings from even the modest reduction now contemplated might be substantial, according to officials and independent experts.
First Published February 9, 2013 12:00 am
