Distinctions drawn in Pa. sex crime laws
Share with others:
HARRISBURG -- Plainly stated, the most serious of the 40 criminal charges lodged three weeks ago against Jerry Sandusky are that he sexually attacked young boys, subjecting them to anal and oral sex.
That may sound to many people like a case of rape, but police and prosecutors turned instead to a different section of Pennsylvania's criminal code for the most serious of the sex offenses the former Penn State University assistant football coach faces.
Each of those seven felony counts of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse carries a potential sentence of up to 20 years in prison, the same as rape.
The question of whether to "call a rape a rape," as New York Times ombudsman Arthur S. Brisbane put it last week, comes down to the finer points of Pennsylvania state law, discretionary decisions made by police and prosecutors and the necessarily politically charged language of sex in general and violent sexual offenses in particular.
Legal experts say the Pennsylvania definition of the two crimes overlap considerably, but the legal definition of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, which pertains to anal and oral sex, any type of sex with an animal, and penetration with foreign objects, covers behavior different from a rape involving vaginal sex between an adult man and woman.
Forced anal sex can be charged as rape. It's not unusual for the two offenses to be lodged together for a single criminal act.
The decision about whether to charge rape or IDSI, as it is often referred to, can be a matter of courtroom tactics. Prosecutors sometimes worry that in scenarios such as the Sandusky allegations, where there has not been male-female vaginal sex, jurors can balk at declaring it rape.
"The layperson considers rape in terms of ordinary sexual intercourse," said northwestern Pennsylvania District Attorney Francis J. Schultz, president of the state prosecutors' association. "In Crawford County, we would choose the more specific offense if we were talking about anal or oral. We're going to charge IDSI. And it probably varies from prosecutor's office to prosecutor's office."
Gary Asteak, a criminal defense lawyer in Easton, prefers the term rape to involuntary deviate sexual intercourse for clarity's sake.
"Let's call it what it is," Mr. Asteak said. "IDSI is kind of a long term. ... It's a whole lot easier to say rape."
Even within the IDSI statute, there are different ways to charge. Mr. Sandusky's IDSI counts were filed under a provision that applies when victims are under age 16 and the perpetrator is at least four years older, but not the victim's spouse.
The grand jury report issued when Mr. Sandusky was charged Nov. 5 lists eight purported victims, all boys, none identified by name.
Involuntary deviate sexual intercourse was charged in relation to four of them: "Victim 1," a boy Mr. Sandusky allegedly fondled and engaged in oral sex with; "Victim 2," an as-yet unidentified child whom another coach reported seeing subjected to anal sex in the team showers; "Victim 4," who prosecutors say became a fixture in the Sandusky household, and whom Mr. Sandusky is accused of trying to penetrate orally and anally; and "Victim 6," also unidentified, who jurors said was seen by a janitor in the showers being subjected to oral sex.
Mr. Sandusky has denied the allegations against him, and a preliminary hearing is scheduled for next month.
First Published November 28, 2011 12:00 am