Anti-gun-control bill speeding through Legislature

May 9, 2012 1:54 pm

Share with others:

HARRISBURG -- A bill fast-tracking through the General Assembly aims to send a tough message to local governments in Pennsylvania: Pass gun-control measures at your own financial peril.

The legislation would penalize municipalities -- including Philadelphia and 29 others -- that have enacted laws to curb illegal gun sales by requiring them to pay damages and penalties to plaintiffs who challenge those laws in the courts.

The bill is being applauded by the National Rifle Association and condemned by such local officials as Lancaster's mayor and Philadelphia's district attorney.

The proposal, which would expand the rights of the NRA and other interest groups to sue municipalities, easily passed the Republican-controlled House Judiciary Committee last week within days of its introduction and without public hearings. It could go to a full House vote as soon as March; its fate in the state Senate is unclear.

Under the bill, plaintiffs who challenge local gun-control ordinances could seek reimbursement for double their actual damages, attorney fees and costs, even if the municipality repeals the ordinance before a ruling is made in the case.

A court also may impose a $5,000 penalty and the plaintiff can seek triple damages, in addition to costs and attorney fees, if a judge finds the municipality violated the state preemption law.

Boroughs, townships and cities across the state began enacting local ordinances aimed at cracking down on illegal gun trafficking in 2008 after the General Assembly failed to take action on a statewide measure to crack down on so-called straw purchases of guns.

The ordinances in Pittsburgh and Philadelphia have so far stood up to legal challenge. Six cases heard by state courts, including one that went to the state Supreme Court, found that plaintiffs -- including individuals and the NRA -- did not have standing in court to sue.

The bill addresses that issue head-on by granting such standing to any "aggrieved party" belonging to a gun rights group -- or as the bill puts it, to any "membership organization ... that is dedicated in whole or in part to protecting the legal, civil or constitutional rights of its membership."


First Published February 16, 2012 12:00 am
PG Products