![]() Pittsburgh, Pa. |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inside the NHL: Crackdown remains in effect, only more subtle
Sunday, October 12, 2003 By Dejan Kovacevic, Post-Gazette Sports Writer
This time a year ago, the Andy van Hellemond tour was playing more dates than the Boss. Possibly even to better reviews.
Van Hellemend, NHL director of officiating, traveled across North America last winter to get out the word that the league finally was serious about reducing hooking, holding and other obstruction with the purpose of returning speed to the game. He spoke with every team's management and players, informing them of the new standard through videotapes, pamphlets and demonstrations. He chatted on talk shows, interviewed for newspapers and spoke directly to fans
Face Off:
Dejan Kovacevic's
Ice Level
In many places, including here, he became a bit of a hero. The Penguins' power play was clicking at an astronomical rate, close to 40 percent, and that was only a slice of the excitement being seen around the league. For the first time since the early 1990s, it looked like real hockey was back. Maybe to stay.
But by December, as always is the case with the NHL, it imploded. Goals per game dropped to their usual level, the teams bold enough to try riskier styles early on quickly reverted to form, and goals per game ended up at 5.31, a minuscule increase from 5.24 the previous season. The league, including van Hellemond, went right back to getting panned, almost universally.
Which is why, this year, all that is heard from New York on the matter is stone silence. Publicly, anyway.
Members of the Penguins' management and players say the league has not abated its emphasis on the obstruction standard in the slightest. During training camp, they still saw video, read literature and heard firsthand explanations.
"Things are quieter for other people, probably," center Rico Fata said. "But they've done a good job of making sure we're aware of it."
Part of the reason the NHL is keeping a low public profile on the matter doubtless is that it risks yet another round of embarrassment at the first sign of any waning in the enforcement.
The sensitivity on the issue was evident last week when Colin Campbell, the league's director of hockey operations, snapped at a reporter during a conference call who asked about the "endless cycle" of cracking down in October, falling apart by New Year's Day, then cracking down again the next fall.
"I'm tired of hearing that kind of observation from guys like you," Campbell said. "When we get media complaining about penalties called, we get players complaining about penalties called, and we get coaches complaining about penalties called, and we get fans complaining about penalties called. ... Obviously, I'm defensive when it comes to this, but we have worked hard on this. We try to open up play."
The primary reason they have not succeeded, many in the game feel, is that their emphasis is on keeping forecheckers from being slowed. There is no emphasis on fouls against the puck-carrier.
An example came at Mellon Arena Friday: Martin Straka was hauled down while trying to carry the puck into the Los Angeles slot but was taken by a Kings defenseman. No call. The play went the other way, and Mario Lemieux was whistled for hooking because he slowed an opposing forward who did not have the puck but was trying to join the attack.
The second foul -- peculiarly --is viewed as more serious by the referees, undoubtedly because of the crackdown's emphasis. This, of course, is the equivalent of NFL referees calling pass interference only when it involves receivers nowhere near the intended throw.
What went right for the league at the start of last season was that players widely misinterpreted the crackdown to mean all obstruction would be emphasized. As a result, there was a blissful period of fast, creative hockey league-wide. Within two months, as matters became clear, puck-carriers again were fair game for fouls.
The league's stated goal by stressing obstruction on the forecheck is to remove the reflex of hooking and holding. Officials acknowledge this will take years.
The Penguins' players, especially those who make a living through forechecking, appreciate at least what has been done in that regard.
"It takes a while to get that out of of the system. For years, guys have been able to get away with that little tug, so I think that's been good so far," left winger Kelly Buchberger said. "But it's going to take time."
One member of management rolled his eyes when asked about the subject.
"Yeah, they're talking to us," he said. "Get back to me in November, and I'll tell you what I think about it then."
Icy chips
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Search | Contact Us | Site Map | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertise | About Us | What's New | Help | Corrections Copyright ©1997-2007 PG Publishing Co., Inc. All Rights Reserved. |
|||||||||||||||