![]() Pittsburgh, Pa. |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inside the NHL: McKenna urges movement on CBA
Sunday, September 14, 2003 By Dejan Kovacevic, Post-Gazette Sports Writer
Rare is the issue brought to Steve McKenna's attention that fails to prompt a smile, a joke, a playful gesture of some sort. But mention the potential for an NHL work stoppage next year, and he turns as serious as if he is about to drop the gloves.
"The players know what's coming, and the owners know what's coming," he said. "I'm sure no one wants to see it."
McKenna, a 6-foot-8 left winger who serves as the Penguins' main enforcer, is bracing for a battle he know will be more difficult than any he has fought on the ice. He is the team's player representative with the NHL Players Association, and it will be his responsibility to keep his teammates informed about all events and issues leading up to the expiration of the league's Collective Bargaining Agreement.
What frustrates him most at the moment is that he has nothing to report. That is because, even though the CBA ends Sept. 15, 2004, a year from tomorrow, there has yet to be one meeting between NHL commissioner Gary Bettman and NHLPA chief Bob Goodenow. And if they cannot even agree on when and where to exchange unpleasantries, there is little cause for hope that the 2004-05 season can be salvaged.
"It's just a matter of getting the two heads together," McKenna said. "It couldn't hurt, right? It couldn't hurt for both of them to just sit down, have a cup of coffee and say, 'Hey, here's where we are.' I'm not a businessman to know how that works, but ... I do know that I don't want to see the season washed away. Nobody does."
No one has started brewing that coffee yet, but there are recent signs that movement is coming.
NHL officials are indicating they would like to begin setting the framework for talks in November, possibly through a written proposal to come to the table. That would be well before the deadline of May 15, 2004, for the league to notify the union that it intends to terminate the existing CBA, which it will do. The union is not obliged to respond to such a proposal at this stage, but Goodenow would not be eager to cast himself -- and the players he represents -- in the villain's role so early in the process by ignoring it.
Even if they do sit at the table this fall, though, that will be taken by few as a sign that an agreement will occur. The differences between the sides are enormous and, many feel, insurmountable without the pressure of a work stoppage.
"I hope it doesn't happen," McKenna said. "I don't want to see that season wiped away, and I can guarantee you that 700-plus players in the league feel the same way. There are millions of fans who want to see hockey, too. I think both sides have to realize that. Look at baseball. Who knows if they've made up for what they lost after their work stoppage all these years later? If the owners lock us out, it's going to be tough for hockey, but ... we'll see what they want to do."
Mario Lemieux is in the unique position of being player and owner, although he has made clear that he takes the owners' perspective of the CBA. Like other owners, he is not permitted to discuss the issue in detail because of a Bettman gag order. But he did share McKenna's plea for movement on both sides.
"I'm optimistic something's going to be done," Lemieux said. "I'm optimistic that both sides are going to realize that something has to be done, and I think they'll come to the table and make a deal."
Icy chips
|
|
|
|
Search | Contact Us | Site Map | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertise | About Us | What's New | Help | Corrections Copyright ©1997-2007 PG Publishing Co., Inc. All Rights Reserved. |
|||