c.2014 New York Times News Service
Calling the movement of crude oil by rail an “imminent hazard” to the public, the U.S. Department of Transportation said Wednesday that railroads would be required to notify local emergency responders whenever oil shipments traveled through their states.
The emergency order follows a spate of accidents that have raised concerns about the safety of trains that are carrying increasing amounts of crude oil from the Bakken region of North Dakota across the United States.
The order said that within 30 days, railroads carrying more than 1 million gallons of Bakken crude, the equivalent of about 35 tank cars, must provide state emergency commissions with detailed information about their shipments. Typically, oil trains carry about 100 cars or more.
This requirement includes disclosing the number of trains on a weekly basis, the counties they will be crossing and the specific routes the trains will be traveling.
Until now, railroads were under no obligation to disclose any of that information, and provided it under strict conditions only if it was asked for.
In addition, transportation regulators also said they would urge shippers to stop using older tank cars to carry crude oil, recommending that they use cars with “the highest level of integrity in their fleet when transporting Bakken crude oil.”
The announcements come a week after an oil train derailed in Lynchburg, Virginia, spilling 30,000 gallons into the James River, erupting into flames and forcing the evacuation of 350 people.
It was the latest in a series of accidents that have caught industry regulators as well as railroads off guard. Last year an oil train exploded in Lac-Mégantic, Quebec, killing 47 people.
Wednesday’s announcement had the starkest language yet about the dangers of crude oil transport from regulators, who have been criticized by lawmakers and safety advocates for being slow-footed.
The number of accidents, the order said, “is startling, and the quantity of petroleum crude oil spilled as a result of those accidents is voluminous” in comparison to past accidents.
Last month, regulators in Canada said they would require emergency plans from the railroads on responding to catastrophic explosions, and would quickly retire older models of tank cars commonly used to carry crude oil and ethanol.
Canada also took a decisive step to force shippers to use a stronger model of tank car within the next three years, effectively setting a new benchmark in the U.S. as well given the amount of traffic between the two countries. The new model is based on a standard developed by the railroad industry in 2011.
Communities around the nation have seen a surge in oil traffic in the past five years because of a boom in domestic oil production, particularly from the Bakken Shale region. This Bakken oil, which accounts for almost all the crude oil in the U.S. that is transported by train, is also more flammable than other types of crude oil and is more likely to travel by pipeline. The Bakken region produces about 1 million barrels of crude each day; about two-thirds of that is shipped by rail.
Many states, including New York, Oregon and Minnesota, and cities like Seattle have urged railroads to provide more information about their shipments, something the industry has resisted so far, invoking protections from state oversight afforded by federal commerce rules.
The railroad industry has traditionally been secretive about routing of its hazardous materials, citing security concerns. Earlier this year, railroads said they would treat oil as a hazardous material and agreed to speed limits, among other things, to increase safety.
But in its latest announcement, the Department of Transportation said the recent accidents “have demonstrated the need for emergency action to address unsafe conditions or practices in the shipment of crude oil by rail.”
It required that railroads also assist state officials in disseminating any information they provide to emergency responders in the affected counties.
Also, according to transportation officials, the shipping information provided by railroads would not be made public. It would instead be restricted to emergency personnel, something rail officials have long insisted on.
But some elected officials remained skeptical about how the requirements would be put into effect.
“The DOT absolutely needs to further clarify to the oil and rail companies how to implement these steps, as I’m concerned that calls for action without clear guidelines won’t actually do much to improve safety,” Sen. Heidi Heitkamp, D-N.D., said in a statement.
The Association of American Railroads said in a statement that rail companies would do “all they can to comply with the Department of Transportation’s emergency order.”
In a separate safety alert, regulators sought to “encourage” shippers and rail carriers to “take additional precautionary measures to enhance the safe shipment of bulk quantities of Bakken crude oil by rail throughout the United States.”
It also advised railroads and shippers to avoid using older tank cars when carrying crude oil “to the extent reasonably practicable.”
(STORY CAN END HERE. OPTIONAL MATERIAL FOLLOWS.)
The Transportation Department is still working on updating standards for the old tank cars, known as DOT-111s, which have been in service since the 1960s. It recently sent its proposed new rules for review by the White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs and expects to make them public by the summer.
Regulators are weighing the proper timeline for phasing in the new cars. A timeline that is too quick would curtail shipments from the Bakken region.
There are more than 94,000 of those tank cars used to transport crude oil in Canada and the U.S., according to the Railway Supply Institute, a trade group for rail car suppliers and owners. About 14,000 of them were built after 2011 based on a new industry standard, CPC-1232, that complies with the new Canadian rules. A total of 55,000 have been ordered through 2015, according to the group.
But complicating matters, the Association of American Railroads, which helped set the new tank car standards in 2011, has since called for even tougher standards. The association, representing major freight carriers, said in November that the government should develop more-stringent regulations and aggressively phase out or refit old tank cars, including the CPC-1232.
The association’s newest proposals include using thicker shells to strengthen the tank cars and equipping them with features to better withstand a crash. It is unclear whether those proposals are part of the government rules being considered.
The delays over a federal standard have complicated matters for shippers and oil companies. Some companies, like Canada’s National Railway and Canadian Pacific, said they would charge higher rates for customers that move crude in rail cars built before October 2011.
Others have taken voluntary steps. Global Partners, which operates a large rail yard in Albany, New York, said last week that it would require oil trains arriving at its terminals to comply with the CPC-1232 design starting on June 1. The company has led the expansion of the Albany crude terminal, which supplies a large number of East Coast refineries.United States - North America - United States government - Canada - New York - Albany - U.S. Department of Transportation - Heidi Heitkamp