EmailEmail
PrintPrint
Food fight: The farm bill's subsidies have an unseen cost
Wednesday, April 30, 2008

What's wrong with this picture? One of America's health problems is obesity; the world's, malnutrition.

Congress and the White House are trying to craft a farm bill that continues the practice of government paying farmers not to grow crops on some of their land. Yet it's clear that one way for a world economy to reduce the food shortage is for farmers to grow more.

Farm prices in the United States are up, and consumers know it all too well. At the same time, farmers want to retain their federal subsidies, sometimes even to support extraordinary products like tobacco.

Farmers argue that they should be paid subsidies even when prices are high, because one day prices will fall and they have to plan ahead. The claim that so much of their costs are energy-related that they are entitled to special treatment doesn't hold water, when the cost of everyone's bread and butter depends on the price of energy.

So where is the country left? Americans are targeted by farmers with an argument that is based, as usual, in the politics of fear: If the nation's farms stop producing, it will be dependent on imported food, and what will happen if the United States is an island of freedom in the middle of a hostile world?

There is no easy answer, and rational resolution of the problem is made worse by the fact that farm states have disproportionate power in Congress. Just look at what the various candidates had to say when they were trying to win the Iowa caucuses in January. None of them dared to oppose subsidies.

Now, it's President Bush saying the farm bill costs too much, while Congress doesn't care if it busts the budget, as long as farmers in their states are placated.

Meanwhile, on a global level, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon says the World Food Program needs another $755 million -- a pittance in terms of the cost of the Iraq war -- if many people around the world are not to starve because of rising prices of staples like rice and wheat.

If the United States had more sensible policies at home, it might be able to play a more helpful role abroad.

First published on April 30, 2008 at 12:00 am