|
In the past 10 years, the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health has issued eight "notifications to users" regarding problems with emergency breathing devices -- self-contained self-rescuers -- used by miners.
|
|||
The poisonous gases in a Kentucky coal mine where five miners died Saturday have finally cleared. What isn't clear is whether the emergency breathing devices the miners carried with them worked properly. And, if not, why?
Three of the miners who died Saturday at Darby Mine No. 1 survived the initial blast only to be overcome by carbon monoxide. Another miner, Paul Ledford, who survived, told his brother that the air pack he used to escape worked for only five minutes.
However, David G. Dye, acting administrator of the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration, has said in a statement that Mr. Ledford's air pack worked properly.
It's the kind of discrepancy that has frustrated miners and their families and sparked government investigations.
The men who died of carbon monoxide poisoning in Kentucky were using the same make and model air pack -- called a self-contained self-rescuer -- as the Sago Mine disaster victims in West Virginia. The lone survivor of Sago, Randal McCloy Jr., has said that some of the SCSRs his co-workers carried did not work.
"Since January, 14 miners have died and one, my husband Randy, suffered a severe brain injury as a direct result of carbon monoxide poisoning in the mines," Anna McCloy said in a statement released yesterday from her home in Simpson, W.Va. "Report after report has shown the rescuers did not work like they are supposed to. ... Why?"
Investigators with the Mine Safety and Health Administration have checked the SCSRs carried by the Sago miners and said that the units appear to have been activated and should have worked. The units have been forwarded to a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health laboratory for additional testing.
These aren't the first instances when NIOSH has been called in to check miners' SCSRs. In the last 10 years, there have been nearly three dozen investigations into complaints concerning air packs.
According to NIOSH spokesman Fred Blosser in Washington, D.C., only eight of those reviews resulted in recalls or replacement of the SCSRs involved.
The eight complaints that brought about recalls or replacements affected all four companies that manufactured SCSRs: Ocenco; Draeger; CSE; and MSA. MSA, which is based in Pittsburgh, stands for Mine Safety Appliances, but MSA spokesman Mark Deasy yesterday said the company stopped making SCSRs in 2004 and shipped its last batch out in January 2005.
MSA got out of the SCSR business, he said, not because of trouble making the units but because another company, Monroeville-based CSE, dominated the market to the point that it was not profitable for MSA.
CSE is the maker of the SR-100 units used at the Sago and Darby mines.
Mr. Blosser said most of the units tested by NIOSH are done the request of the user.
"That's part of our mission, and we've been doing this for years," he said. "The Sago investigation is a different animal because it was something MSHA requested us to do specifically.
"The process is that we will give [our] report to MSHA and the information will become part of their record of the investigation."
Mrs. McCloy is one of those waiting for the investigation to reach its next step.
"MSHA and various company officials continue to say the rescuers were tested and had operated properly," she said in her statement. "This doesn't add up."
Mr. Blosser expressed sympathy for Mrs. McCloy and everyone else demanding answers.
"It's understandable," he said. "People are concerned.
"If these devices are regarded with some degree of uncertainty, we want to do what we can to help provide answers."
