Reg Henry: Not to put a damper on ice buckets, but ...

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

If you are on Face­book — and if you are not, let me just ob­serve how well that speaks of you — a strange phe­nom­e­non has un­doubt­edly come to your at­ten­tion. Many of your friends and re­la­tions are pour­ing cold wa­ter over their heads.

This is good in many ways. Who hasn’t wanted to pour cold wa­ter on their friends and re­la­tions on oc­ca­sion? Now they are do­ing it them­selves to save you the trou­ble. But, as al­ways, the temp­ta­tion to pour more cold wa­ter on a good prac­tice seems ir­re­sist­ible to those of us in the cur­mud­geon com­mu­nity.

What is go­ing on be­fore our so­cial me­dia eyes is the so-called Ice Bucket Chal­lenge on be­half of the ALS As­so­ci­a­tion, which has raised buck­ets of money thereby. As of Tues­day, ac­cord­ing to a press re­lease, this method has raised $22.9 mil­lion for the as­so­ci­a­tion, which trans­lates to 453,210 new do­nors.

A num­ber of ex­pla­na­tions for the chal­lenge have been of­fered. It seems to have evolved from peo­ple flood­ing them­selves for fun to goof­ing off for a char­i­ta­ble pur­pose. Pete Frates, a for­mer Boston Col­lege base­ball cap­tain who is an ALS pa­tient, is prom­i­nently cred­ited for pro­mot­ing the chal­lenge as a way to raise do­na­tions to help oth­ers with the dis­ease.

The point is that some pro­fes­sional mar­ket­ing ge­nius in a fancy suit did not think up the idea; it ap­pears to have just sort of hap­pened spon­ta­ne­ously. The ALS As­so­ci­a­tion was as sur­prised as any­one to dis­cover that it was sud­denly Christ­mas in July (and Au­gust).

As well as the great flow of cold cash, the other wind­fall is rec­og­ni­tion for ALS, a cru­elly pro­gres­sive neu­rode­gen­er­a­tive dis­ease for which no cure ex­ists.

Mer­ritt Hol­land Spier, the ex­ec­u­tive di­rec­tor of the Western Penn­syl­va­nia chap­ter of the as­so­ci­a­tion, reck­ons that un­til the buck­ets came out, half the na­tion didn’t know what the dis­ease was. She mar­vels at the fact this trans­for­ma­tive mo­ment in pub­lic aware­ness is hap­pen­ing 75 years af­ter Lou Ge­h­rig, the Yan­kees great, was di­ag­nosed with ALS and made it known to the world.

It would take a very dis­agree­able sort of per­son to raise ob­jec­tions to any of this — and I know just the man for the job. Me. I am a dry sort of char­ac­ter and, when it comes to the Ice Bucket Chal­lenge, I fully in­tend to re­main dry.

As men­tioned above, I think the ALS As­so­ci­a­tion is the cham­pion of a great cause and its good for­tune is not to be be­grudged. I get it: Just as it’s an ill wind that doesn’t blow some­body some good, it is a chill wa­ter that doesn’t do some cause some good. And if peo­ple want to pour ice wa­ter on them­selves, fine — just don’t in­volve me in their damp am­bi­tions.

When it comes to pub­lic en­thu­si­asms, I am the sort of per­son who re­fuses to do “the wave” at the ball­park. It seems to me that it is an in­sult to the game to be so bored by the ac­tion that you have to throw your arms in the air in rhythm with thou­sands of oth­ers sim­i­larly in need of dis­trac­tion. Be­sides, what does the smell of 30,000 ex­posed arm­pits do to the con­cen­tra­tion of the pitcher and bat­ter? It is not help­ful. Lou Ge­h­rig would have agreed with me on this.

True, with the na­tion steam­ing with var­i­ous prob­lems and frus­tra­tions this sum­mer, an ex­cuse for peo­ple to pour ice wa­ter on their heads is ob­vi­ously tempt­ing — and maybe help­ful to pub­lic mo­rale.

But to dis­agree­able me it is the “sel­fie” cul­ture gone awry. It pro­vides the chance for peo­ple to make a lit­tle speech be­fore they douse them­selves and show how brave they are. But, hey, it’s only cold wa­ter. It’s not go­ing to kill any­one and we know what’s go­ing to hap­pen: The chal­lenge-tak­ers are go­ing to get wet. Big deal! I have a shower ev­ery morn­ing and I spare ev­ery­body the sight.

Not­with­stand­ing the large do­na­tions, I sus­pect some peo­ple are all bucket and no check­book.

Ac­cord­ing to one ver­sion of the chal­lenge, you pay only $10 if you get wet and $100 if you are chal­lenged and refuse. Some peo­ple surely pay the big­ger amount no mat­ter what. But hu­man na­ture be­ing what it is, some peo­ple can be de­pended upon to show off for noth­ing.

If any­one is go­ing to do it, do not use a kid­die-sized bucket, as I saw one of my sis­ters-in-law do.

And don’t bother chal­leng­ing me, Janie, just be­cause I called you out. I am stay­ing dry.


Reg Henry: rhenry@post-ga­zette.com or 412-263-1668.

Join the conversation:

Commenting policy | How to report abuse
To report inappropriate comments, abuse and/or repeat offenders, please send an email to socialmedia@post-gazette.com and include a link to the article and a copy of the comment. Your report will be reviewed in a timely manner. Thank you.
Commenting policy | How to report abuse

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here