Stop anti-gun blather and get to the key questions in Uzi shooting

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

Regarding “Shooting by Girl, 9, Stirs Debate Over Guns” (Aug. 28): As expected, there’s a plethora of anti-gun blather, some from people, reporters included, who perhaps would not know the difference between a “selective fire weapon” and a Model T Ford.

Other things aside, it strikes me that the instructor was careless in allowing an inexperienced child to handle a submachine gun or selective fire weapon. I also wonder as to the attitude of the parents. A .22 caliber rifle, OK, but why on earth any sort of arm capable of full automatic fire?

My wife, a retired social worker and agency director, offered the following: What of the facility owner and the parents of this child? Since he is dead, the instructor is beyond criticism, she notes. As for this 9-year-old girl, how might this affair affect her?

By the way, what I expect from media and some members of the public, the usual anti-gun blather, answers none of the above questions, or any other reasonable questions as might be raised.

ALAN SCHULTZ
McCandless


Join the conversation:

Commenting policy | How to report abuse
To report inappropriate comments, abuse and/or repeat offenders, please send an email to socialmedia@post-gazette.com and include a link to the article and a copy of the comment. Your report will be reviewed in a timely manner. Thank you.
Commenting policy | How to report abuse

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here