PG cherry-picking

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

I am writing in response to the May 5 editorial “Living Wage: Senators Ignore the Plight of Low-Paid Workers.” I am an independent retired certified public accountant.

The PG states, “The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office calculates that raising the wage to $10.10 an hour would lift the hourly wages of 16.5 million workers and boost incomes by $2 billion.”

The PG then states, “CBO estimates projecting a possible loss of 500,000 jobs nationwide … are shaky at best.”

How can you state some estimates made by the CBO that you like “would” happen and other estimates are “shaky at best”?

I believe a living wage is a matter of basic fairness. But is a 39 percent raise, which companies will charge their customers, the right amount? I believe in compromising.

JOHN EDWARD BODDY
Cranberry

 


Join the conversation:

Commenting policy | How to report abuse
To report inappropriate comments, abuse and/or repeat offenders, please send an email to socialmedia@post-gazette.com and include a link to the article and a copy of the comment. Your report will be reviewed in a timely manner. Thank you.
Commenting policy | How to report abuse

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here