Healthy contracts needed for UPMC, Highmark

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

The Jan. 18 article “State Senate Bill Takes Shot at UPMC-Highmark Dispute” by Kate Giammarise discusses a bill that will be introduced in the Pennsylvania Senate that would require hospitals to contract with any willing insurer. Those who support the bill see it as a way to force UPMC and Highmark to play nice and sign a new contract, but they do not address what I consider the most important aspect of the bill: Does it require hospitals to negotiate in good faith with insurers?

If no requirement is established in the law, what is to prevent UPMC from negotiating rates so high with Highmark that Highmark would no longer be willing to contract? Without this requirement, the law is all style and no substance. If a good-faith negotiation requirement is part of the bill, it will provide teeth to the law and actually force these two to sit down and negotiate a new deal.

ROBERT WHALING
South Side

The writer is a student in the health law program at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law.


Join the conversation:

Commenting policy | How to report abuse
To report inappropriate comments, abuse and/or repeat offenders, please send an email to socialmedia@post-gazette.com and include a link to the article and a copy of the comment. Your report will be reviewed in a timely manner. Thank you.
Commenting policy | How to report abuse

Advertisement

Latest in Letters

Education funding
about 4 hours ago
Blow to education
about 4 hours ago
Help Homewood
about 4 hours ago
Bank and coal
about 4 hours ago
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here