Think twice before supporting red-light cameras

Share with others:

Print Email Read Later

What a myopic viewpoint. Regarding last Sunday’s editorial “Traffic Control: City Council Should Back Red-Light Cameras,” the PG editorial board jumps for Pittsburgh camera allowance based on declines of light-related fatalities and violations in Philadelphia. Your board next seems to correlate this to fewer accidents, and more responsible drivers, and all under an opening banner of “It’s a well-known rule of the road: A police officer is rarely around when some jerk blows through a red light.”

For the sake of the Post-Gazette’s readership, grow up.

Common sense, or a cursory Google search, reveals that independent (as well as national media) studies find such cameras also increase intersection accident rates, thereby axing a simplistic safety argument. And considering public-private partnership tie-ups and that enforcement challenges abound, this issue is deservedly more complex than your hastily shaped expression, which I suspect was found on cutting floors of a high-school news class.



Join the conversation:

Commenting policy | How to report abuse
To report inappropriate comments, abuse and/or repeat offenders, please send an email to and include a link to the article and a copy of the comment. Your report will be reviewed in a timely manner. Thank you.
Commenting policy | How to report abuse


Create a free PG account.
Already have an account?