Think twice before supporting red-light cameras

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

What a myopic viewpoint. Regarding last Sunday’s editorial “Traffic Control: City Council Should Back Red-Light Cameras,” the PG editorial board jumps for Pittsburgh camera allowance based on declines of light-related fatalities and violations in Philadelphia. Your board next seems to correlate this to fewer accidents, and more responsible drivers, and all under an opening banner of “It’s a well-known rule of the road: A police officer is rarely around when some jerk blows through a red light.”

For the sake of the Post-Gazette’s readership, grow up.

Common sense, or a cursory Google search, reveals that independent (as well as national media) studies find such cameras also increase intersection accident rates, thereby axing a simplistic safety argument. And considering public-private partnership tie-ups and that enforcement challenges abound, this issue is deservedly more complex than your hastily shaped expression, which I suspect was found on cutting floors of a high-school news class.

DAVID YOCHUM
Scott

 


Join the conversation:

Commenting policy | How to report abuse
To report inappropriate comments, abuse and/or repeat offenders, please send an email to socialmedia@post-gazette.com and include a link to the article and a copy of the comment. Your report will be reviewed in a timely manner. Thank you.
Commenting policy | How to report abuse

Advertisement

Latest in Letters

He needs treatment
1 day ago
Thankfully, no gun
1 day ago
Violent videos
1 day ago
Awful suggestion
1 day ago
Easier than when?
1 day ago
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here