The hard evidence

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

In his article "Lee Harvey Oswald, Revisited" (Oct. 25), Boston Globe columnist Alex Beam includes two statements by journalist Peter Savodnik -- "We know who killed President Kennedy" and "Mr. Savodnik doesn't think Oswald was motivated by politics."

A national poll of 2,200 people conducted last fall for the History Channel revealed that 85 percent of Americans do not accept the Warren Commission's conclusions regarding the single bullet (i.e., "magic bullet") theory and Oswald as the sole assassin.

The underlying basis for the government's official ruling re Oswald's motive was his pro-Communist beliefs. Indeed, FBI director J. Edgar Hoover proclaimed that theory within days of the assassination. Mr. Savodnik, as an experienced investigative reporter, undoubtedly came to realize that the CIA had been setting Oswald up as a patsy several months before Nov. 22, 1963. Hence, his depoliticization of Oswald and his disingenuous characterization of Kennedy's sole assassin as "... some redneck who had problems relating to his mother."

As more hard forensic scientific analyses and investigative facts continue to emerge that unequivocally reject the validity of the Warren Commission Report, it is fascinating to observe how the self-appointed defenders and sycophantic supporters of this quasi-fictional document adroitly adopt purely conjectural alternative theories to justify their discredited, completely invalid contentions.

CYRIL H. WECHT, M.D., J.D.
Squirrel Hill

The writer, a renowned forensic pathologist who received permission in 1972 to examine the Warren Commission's evidence, has been one of the foremost critics of the commission's single-bullet theory.


Join the conversation:

Commenting policy | How to report abuse
To report inappropriate comments, abuse and/or repeat offenders, please send an email to socialmedia@post-gazette.com and include a link to the article and a copy of the comment. Your report will be reviewed in a timely manner. Thank you.
Commenting policy | How to report abuse

Advertisement

Latest in Letters

Education results
about 22 hours ago
Money for voters
about 22 hours ago
Bush’s paintings
about 22 hours ago
AmeriCorps impact
about 22 hours ago
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here