Viability, not looks

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

In the world in which all contraceptives are 100 percent effective and all women have access to the ones that are best suited to their needs; in which maternal death or disability from childbirth never occurs; in which families are supported by workplace policies that prioritize parental responsibilities over profit; in which no family has to live in an unfit house or an unsafe neighborhood or in a car or under a bridge, and no children are hungry or ill-clothed and without access to good schools and recreation; and in which no woman is ever forced to have sex against her will and any woman who has an unwanted pregnancy can easily find a safe and affordable abortion -- in such a world it might be possible to consider Kathleen Parker's criticism of opposition to banning abortion at 20 weeks' gestation because a fetus at that stage "looks very much like a baby" ("Saint Wendy: Filibustering Does Not Make a Hero," July 4).

In our world, it often takes several weeks for women to make arrangements with work and family responsibilities, raise money and travel to a clinic, and comply with unnecessary procedures designed to shame her. State-mandated delays force women to have abortions much later than they might choose. No matter what it looks like, a 20-week fetus is not viable. An embryo has slits that look very much like gills, but I would not suggest that we place it in an aquarium.

Ms. Parker's argument from appearance is a distraction and reduces a woman's life-changing decision to a triviality.

LIZ HRENDA
Squirrel Hill


opinion_letters


Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here