Rich Romney was a poor candidate

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

In the weeks since the election, I have read many articles on why the Republicans lost, and one item was accepted by all: the problem was not the candidate.

I take exception. The Republicans did not put forth a solid, reliable, likable candidate. All the other rationales undoubtedly contributed to the loss in the presidential campaign, but the main reason Mitt Romney lost was because he was not a good candidate.

Just to point out a few problems, in no particular order:

• He is too rich, arrogant and condescending.

• He is out of touch with the middle class and could find no way to relate.

• He is too aggressive.

• He was disrespectful to the president and to women.

• He flip-flopped on virtually every issue, political as well as social.

• He too often spoke without thinking of the consequences and without having all the facts.

• He selected his top advisers unwisely.

• He did not have specific programs in mind to cure the country's problems -- or he could not or would not articulate them.

• He refused to make his tax returns public.

• He is Mormon, a religion not yet universally understood or accepted by Americans.

• He was not popular with world leaders.

• He is not "presidential."

The Republican Party has to make many changes if it intends to win the 2016 presidential election, including putting forth a "good" candidate.

JANE PETERS
Brighton Heights


opinion_letters


Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here