China quotas on metals violate world trade law

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

PARIS -- China has broken international trade law by restricting the export of rare earth elements and other metals crucial to modern manufacturing, a World Trade Organization panel said Wednesday. That conclusion opens the possibility that Beijing will face trade sanctions from the U.S., which initially brought the case, along with the European Union and Japan.

Members of a WTO panel considering the case in Geneva found that the export taxes, quotas and bureaucratic delays Beijing imposes on overseas sales of the minerals artificially raise prices and create shortages for foreign buyers. The panel concluded that "China's export quotas were designed to achieve industrial policy goals" rather than to protect its environment, as Beijing had argued.

China produces more than nine-tenths of the global supply of the strategically important metals, which are essential to a host of modern applications including smartphones, wind turbines, industrial catalysts and high-tech magnets. Prices soared in 2010 after Beijing cut export quotas by about 40 percent, to just over 30,000 tons, saying the restrictions were necessary because mining rare earths creates many environmental hazards.

U.S. and European officials hailed the ruling. Michael B. Froman, the U.S. trade representative, said the trade restrictions had bolstered Chinese industry at the expense of businesses in other countries, forcing them "to pay as much as three times more than what their Chinese competitors pay for the exact same rare earths."

Karel De Gucht, the European trade commissioner, said "China cannot use export restrictions to protect its own industries or give them a helping hand on the global market at the expense of foreign competitors."

The U.S., which is almost totally dependent on China for the metals, filed the case in March 2012, and the EU and Japan joined on Washington's side soon after. They challenged the export restrictions on 17 rare earths, as well as two metals used in steel alloys: molybdenum and tungsten. An interim report by the WTO panel in October had indicated that the panel would rule against China.

In a statement Wednesday, the Chinese Commerce Ministry expressed its "regret" at the ruling, saying it believed its regulatory measures "are perfectly consistent with the objective of sustainable development promoted by the WTO."

China has amply demonstrated the damage caused at each step of the production process, from mining and refining the metals to disposing of the waste, and Beijing has been shutting down some of the worst-offending producers, among them criminal enterprises. The soil in parts of China is scarred from the concentrated acids used to leach the ores, making farming impossible, while giant tailing ponds full of toxic -- and sometimes radioactive -- chemicals attest to the fact that the recovery of every pound of rare earth metals entails the creation of hundreds or thousands of pounds of waste.

China had also argued that the export quotas were justified under trade rules allowing exceptions where such steps "relate to the conservation of exhaustible natural resources."

But the complainants argued that the restrictions were inconsistent with China's obligations under the rules of the WTO, which it joined in 2001, because they were handled "in a manner that is not uniform, impartial, reasonable, or transparent," distorting the market in favor of China's domestic industry.

Critics also argued that despite the claims of environmental protection, China was using its monopoly to create a cost advantage for companies operating within its borders; because the price was lower for domestic users, the arrangement induced foreign companies to set up shop in China to be competitive, creating local jobs and transferring technology.

The panel ruled against China's arguments on all counts.


Join the conversation:

Commenting policy | How to report abuse
To report inappropriate comments, abuse and/or repeat offenders, please send an email to socialmedia@post-gazette.com and include a link to the article and a copy of the comment. Your report will be reviewed in a timely manner. Thank you.
Commenting policy | How to report abuse

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here