U.S. suspends Bangladesh trade privileges

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama announced Thursday the suspension of U.S. trade privileges for Bangladesh in response to growing concerns over labor rights and worker safety in that country.

The decision is the culmination of a years-long review of labor conditions in the impoverished South Asian nation. Pressure on the Obama administration to act intensified after more than 1,200 died when a factory collapsed April 24 -- one of the global garment industry's worst accidents.

In a proclamation, Mr. Obama said Bangladesh was not taking steps to afford internationally recognized worker rights to employees in that country.

Suspending the benefits developing nations receive as part of the Generalized System of Preferences program, or GSP, is a highly symbolic move. As Bangladesh's biggest trading partner after the European Union, the United States hopes that it can exert significant pressure on its authorities to reform labor practices and ensure workers' rights in a country where factory accidents have been all too common, and the minimum wage is just $38 per month.

Recent deadly industrial accidents "caused everyone to grieve, but underscored problems we have seen in Bangladesh for some time," U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman said in a conference call with reporters after the announcement. "Our goal is to see Bangladesh restore its eligibility, but to see workers in safe conditions." He said the administration has no timetable in mind for restoring Bangladesh tariff breaks, noting that this will depend on the progress made in improving workers' conditions.

The United States expects Bangladesh to follow through on approving a new labor law and take a series of other steps being negotiated with the U.S. Labor Department, unions, civic groups and others. The suspension becomes effective in 60 days, after publication in the Federal Register.

The Bangladeshi Embassy did not respond to requests for comment. But its officials in Washington argued strongly against a suspension, and have said their nation is making progress on improving textile industry conditions.

The suspension abolishes tariff breaks granted to about $35 million worth of imports annually. The breaks cover a wide variety of goods imported by the United States free of tax. But the breaks do not apply to Bangladesh's textile industry, which sells in excess of $4.5 billion of goods to the United States each year and, in 2010, accounted for 90 percent of Bangladeshi exports to the country.

Though the GSP tariff breaks apply to only a small percentage of the country's exports, Mr. Froman said the suspension "has greater impact than the numbers themselves suggest, given the public attention and the importance the government attaches."

Trade advocacy groups generally argue against trade-disrupting measures on the grounds that the brunt of the pain falls on workers. Kimberly Elliott, a trade specialist at the Center for Global Development, who has been following issues in Bangladesh, said she believes that offering tariff breaks to textiles -- and the prospect of a boost in Bangladesh's already-massive exports to the United States -- would likely be a more effective strategy. But such a move would be controversial among U.S. textile firms and poor nations such as Haiti and Kenya that benefit from U.S. trade preferences.

"It is pressure from buyers that is going to get Bangladesh to change," Ms. Elliott said. "This case has been dragging on for six years, and it took a building collapse and a thousand people dying for the U.S. government to get to this point. It is not clear to me that it sends that much of a signal."

Another alternative would be to increase tariffs directly on textiles, a move that also would hurt the dozens of U.S. firms that rely on Bangladeshi garment factories for their production.

U.S. retailers Wal-Mart and Gap have resisted participating in an international, legally binding industry accord to improve safety conditions in Bangladeshi factories, which was signed last month mainly by European companies. Instead, they are close to committing to a separate initiative of their own.

world


Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here