Study blames humans for most of melting glaciers

Global warming is the leading culprit; soot pollution, land use also play a role

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

WASHINGTON — More than two-thirds of the re­cent rapid melt­ing of the world’s gla­ciers can be blamed on hu­mans, a new study finds.

Sci­en­tists look­ing at gla­cier melt since 1851 didn’t see a hu­man fin­ger­print un­til about the mid­dle of the 20th cen­tury. Even then, only one-quar­ter of the warm­ing wasn’t from nat­u­ral causes.

But since 1991, about 69 per­cent of the rap­idly in­creas­ing melt was man-made, said Ben Mar­zeion, a cli­mate sci­en­tist at the Univer­sity of Inns­bruck in Aus­tria. “Glaciers are re­ally shrink­ing rap­idly now,” he said. “I think it’s fair to say most of it is man-made.”

Sci­en­tists fault global warm­ing from the burn­ing of coal, oil and gas as well as changes in land use near gla­ciers and soot pol­lu­tion. Glaciers in Alaska and the Alps in gen­eral have more hu­man-caused melt­ing than the global av­er­age, Mr. Mar­zeion said.

The study was pub­lished Thurs­day in the jour­nal Science.

The re­search is the first to cal­cu­late just how much of the gla­cial melt­ing can be at­trib­uted to peo­ple, and “the jump from about a quar­ter to roughly 70 per­cent of to­tal gla­cier mass loss is sig­nifi­cant and con­cern­ing,” said Univer­sity of Alaska Fair­banks geo­phys­i­cist Regine Hock, who wasn’t part of the study.

Over the last two de­cades, about 295 bil­lion tons (269 bil­lion met­ric tons) of ice is melt­ing each year on av­er­age due to hu­man causes and about 130 bil­lion tons (121 mil­lion met­ric tons) a year are melt­ing be­cause of nat­u­ral causes, Mr. Mar­zeion cal­cu­lated.

Glaciers alone add to about four-tenths of an inch of sea level rise ev­ery de­cade, along with even-big­ger in­creases from melt­ing ice sheets — which are dif­fer­ent than gla­ciers — and the ex­pan­sion of wa­ter with warmer tem­per­a­tures.

Mr. Mar­zeion and col­leagues ran mul­ti­ple com­puter sim­u­la­tions to see how much melt­ing there would be from all causes, and then did it again to see how much melt­ing there would be if only nat­u­ral causes were in­cluded. The dif­fer­ence is what was caused by hu­mans.

Sci­en­tists aren’t quite cer­tain what nat­u­ral causes started gla­ciers shrink­ing af­ter the end of the Lit­tle Ice Age in the mid­dle of the 19th cen­tury, but do know what are hu­man-causes: cli­mate change, soot and lo­cal changes in land use.

There is a siz­able mar­gin of er­ror, so the 69 per­cent hu­man-caused can be as low as 45 per­cent or as high as 93 per­cent, but likely in the mid­dle.

“This study makes per­fect sense,” said Penn­syl­va­nia State Univer­sity gla­cier ex­pert Rich­ard Al­ley, who wasn’t part of the re­search. “The au­thors have quan­ti­fied what I be­lieve most sci­en­tists would have ex­pected.”

Not all of the hu­man-caused melt­ing is from global warm­ing from the burn­ing of fos­sil fu­els, but cli­mate change is the big­gest fac­tor, said Ted Scam­bos, a sci­en­tist at the Na­tional Snow and Ice Data Center.

The study showed that it took time for global warm­ing and other fac­tors to build up and cause melt­ing. That lag ef­fect means the world is al­ready locked into more rapid melt­ing from the warm­ing that has al­ready oc­curred, Mr. Mar­zeion and Mr. Al­ley said.

United States - North America - Alaska


Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here