Grand jury to take up death linked to New York City police chokehold

Rights advocates draw link to Missouri killing

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

NEW YORK — Amid weeks of pro­tests and calls for fed­eral in­ter­ven­tion, the Staten Island dis­trict at­tor­ney an­nounced Tues­day that he would open a grand jury in­ves­ti­ga­tion into the death of an un­armed black man dur­ing an ar­rest last month, a pro­cess that could lead to in­dict­ments of the po­lice of­fi­cers in­volved.

The death of Eric Garner, 43, in­flamed ten­sions be­tween the New York Po­lice Depart­ment and mi­nor­ity com­mu­ni­ties, as widely dis­trib­uted cell phone vid­eos of the con­fron­ta­tion showed Mr. Garner strug­gling for breath as an of­fi­cer clung to his neck and back.

Over the past week, civil rights ad­vo­cates drew a link be­tween those im­ages and the fa­tal shoot­ing of an un­armed black teen­ager Aug. 9 in Fer­gu­son, Mo., with some, in­clud­ing the Rev. Al Sharp­ton, shut­tling be­tween the two dis­pa­rate scenes — a largely peace­ful Staten Island and the smoke-filled streets of a com­mu­nity near St. Louis — to press for the pros­e­cu­tion of of­fi­cers in both ep­i­sodes.

In New York, de­mands for crim­i­nal pros­e­cu­tions grew louder af­ter the city med­i­cal ex­am­iner ruled Mr. Garner’s death a ho­mi­cide caused by a choke­hold as well as the com­pres­sion of his chest dur­ing the ar­rest. The dis­trict at­tor­ney, Daniel M. Dono­van Jr., cited the au­topsy, as well as an in­ves­ti­ga­tion by his of­fice, in his de­ci­sion to im­panel a grand jury be­gin­ning in Sep­tem­ber.

“I will go wher­ever the ev­i­dence takes me, with­out fear or fa­vor,” Mr. Dono­van said in his state­ment, de­clin­ing to com­ment on de­tails of the grand jury in­quiry or when it might be com­pleted.

Mayor Bill de Bla­sio, who has strug­gled to main­tain a bal­ance be­tween as­suag­ing com­mu­nity out­rage at Mr. Garner’s death and sup­port­ing rank-and-file of­fi­cers doubt­ful of his back­ing, said in a terse state­ment that he was “pleased” with the de­ci­sion, add­ing, “The le­gal pro­cess is now un­der­way.”

Be­fore Mr. Dono­van’s an­nounce­ment, many ad­vo­cates urged fed­eral pros­e­cu­tors to take over the case, ques­tion­ing whether a dis­trict at­tor­ney from Staten Island, the small­est of the city’s five bor­oughs and home to many po­lice of­fi­cers, would zeal­ously pur­sue what could prove to be a dif­fi­cult case against the of­fi­cers.

Six mem­bers of Con­gress asked At­tor­ney Gen­eral Eric Holder to open a fed­eral in­ves­ti­ga­tion into the case, say­ing they saw no in­di­ca­tion that the lo­cal dis­trict at­tor­ney was “pre­pared to ag­gres­sively pros­e­cute the case.” Mr. Sharp­ton, who has also urged fed­eral in­volve­ment and is plan­ning a demon­stra­tion on Staten Island for Satur­day, said Mr. Dono­van’s an­nounce­ment did not dampen his calls for a fed­eral civil rights case.

Mr. Holder, who is set to travel to­day to Mis­souri, has said the Justice Depart­ment is mon­i­tor­ing the Staten Island in­ves­ti­ga­tion. But fed­eral au­thor­i­ties have thus far re­mained on the side­lines of Mr. Garner’s case, in part, for­mer pros­e­cu­tors said, be­cause a state case can be made more com­pli­cated if fed­eral pros­e­cu­tors go first. The stan­dard for prov­ing a fed­eral case can also be tough, re­quir­ing pros­e­cu­tors to pres­ent ev­i­dence that the of­fi­cers in­tended to de­prive Mr. Garner of his civil rights based on his race.

Legal ex­perts and for­mer pros­e­cu­tors said that de­spite the med­i­cal ex­am­iner’s rul­ing that the death was a ho­mi­cide, mur­der charges seemed un­likely be­cause the ep­i­sode that ended with Mr. Garner’s death July 17 be­gan as a rou­tine ar­rest. Of­fi­cers are gen­er­ally given wide lat­i­tude to use force within de­part­ment guide­lines and their pro­fes­sional judg­ment. A lesser ho­mi­cide charge, such as sec­ond-de­gree man­slaugh­ter or crim­i­nally neg­li­gent ho­mi­cide, could be pos­si­ble, le­gal ex­perts said.

But be­fore that, the grand jury must weigh whether there is enough ev­i­dence to go for­ward with a crim­i­nal pros­e­cu­tion, and if so, against which of the of­fi­cers pres­ent. Mr. Dono­van said in a state­ment that he would not com­ment on any de­tails of the grand jury’s in­ves­ti­ga­tion, in­clud­ing the na­ture of the charges, wit­nesses and po­ten­tial tar­gets.

United States - North America - New York City - New York - Eric Holder - Missouri - Al Sharpton - Staten Island - Bill de Blasio


Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here