Ferguson highlights police use of military gear

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

FERGUSON, Mo. — The fo­cus on con­tin­u­ing pro­tests here turned Thurs­day to­ward para­mil­i­tary tac­tics and equip­ment that crit­ics — even among some law en­force­ment lead­ers — said have pro­voked vi­o­lence from the crowds.

Calls for St. Louis County and Fer­gu­son po­lice to “de­mil­i­ta­rize” the re­sponse ranged from peo­ple on the streets near where an un­armed teen­ager was shot Satur­day to U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., and U.S. At­tor­ney Gen­eral Eric Holder.

Writ­ing in TIME mag­a­zine, U.S. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said scenes in Fer­gu­son re­sem­bled “war more than tra­di­tional po­lice ac­tion.”

Tac­ti­cal of­fi­cers in body ar­mor and bal­lis­tic hel­mets do look far more like sol­diers de­ployed to Iraq or Af­ghan­istan than the po­lice of de­cades ago, who of­ten man­aged ri­ots with miner-style hard hats and wooden ba­tons as their only spe­cial gear.

Fer­gu­son’s tear gas may be fa­mil­iar through the gen­er­a­tions. But use of ar­mored ve­hi­cles, a sonic blaster to dis­perse crowds with sound and .60-cal­i­ber rub­ber “Stinger” rounds for “pain com­pli­ance” are rel­a­tively new to the work.

Tim Lynch, di­rec­tor of the CATO In­sti­tute Proj­ect on Crim­i­nal Justice, said po­lice use of mil­i­tary weap­ons and tac­tics ac­cel­er­ated af­ter the 2001 al-Qaida ter­ror­ist at­tacks, in part be­cause of Home­land Se­cu­rity grants. He com­plained that fed­eral money is “dis­tort­ing de­ci­sion-mak­ing on the lo­cal level,” by giv­ing away “M-16s, gre­nade launch­ers, ar­mored ve­hi­cles.”

“The down­side is that we are start­ing to blur the ci­vil­ian po­lice mis­sion with the mil­i­tary mis­sion, and when that hap­pens, there are un­nec­es­sary, vi­o­lent con­fron­ta­tions be­tween the po­lice and cit­i­zens — such as we’re see­ing in Fer­gu­son,.” Mr. Lynch said.

But in a news con­fer­ence Thurs­day, Fer­gu­son Po­lice Chief Tom Jack­son, whose de­part­ment does not have a SWAT team of its own, de­fended the con­cept. “The tac­ti­cal units will be out there if fire­bombs start get­ting thrown, prop­erty is get­ting de­stroyed, shots are be­ing fired, peo­ple are be­ing shot at. We have to re­spond to deadly force,” he said.

“The whole pic­ture is be­ing painted a lit­tle bit side­ways from what’s re­ally hap­pen­ing,” Chief Jack­son said. “And it’s not mil­i­tary; it’s tac­ti­cal op­er­a­tions. It’s SWAT teams, that’s who’s out there: po­lice — we’re do­ing this in blue.”

Full de­tails of the tac­ti­cal gear be­ing de­ployed in Fer­gu­son by the St. Louis County po­lice and other agen­cies are not avail­able.

The Depart­ment of De­fense’s 1033 Pro­gram may have pro­vided some of the equip­ment, but it isn’t clear how much of this gear was pur­chased from other fed­eral pro­grams or lo­cal bud­gets. The 1033 Pro­gram has trans­ferred more than $4.3 bil­lion in sur­plus mil­i­tary equip­ment to thou­sands of law en­force­ment agen­cies and oth­ers. It is in­tended for “counter-nar­cot­ics and counter-ter­ror­ism op­er­a­tions, and to en­hance of­fi­cer safety,” ac­cord­ing to the Mis­souri Depart­ment of Pub­lic Safety web site.

United States - North America - Eric Holder - Missouri - Claire McCaskill - Rand Paul - John Blake


Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here