Arizona loses migrant license dispute

Court rules state can’t refuse driver’s IDs to some youths

Share with others:

Print Email Read Later

PHOENIX — A fed­eral ap­peals court has dealt a new blow to Ari­zona in its se­ries of im­mi­gra­tion-re­lated crack­downs, rul­ing that the state can­not deny driver’s li­censes to young im­mi­grants who are al­lowed to stay in the United States un­der a 2012 Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion pol­icy.

Ari­zona was one of two states that re­fused to is­sue li­censes to the im­mi­grants, spark­ing the lat­est court fight over the is­sue.

Re­pub­li­can Gov. Jan Brewer called the rul­ing mis­guided and said she was con­sid­er­ing ap­peal.

The de­ci­sion fol­lows other high-pro­file bat­tles be­tween Ari­zona and the fed­eral gov­ern­ment over im­mi­gra­tion, in­clud­ing court de­ci­sions that struck down much of a 2010 en­force­ment law but up­held its most hotly de­bated sec­tion, which re­quires po­lice to check im­mi­gra­tion sta­tus un­der cer­tain cir­cum­stances.

“We hope that this rul­ing sig­nals the end of what has been an un­for­tu­nate anti-im­mi­grant pe­riod in Ari­zona,” said Karen Tum­lin, one of the at­tor­neys rep­re­sent­ing the im­mi­grants. The de­ci­sion should re­move any bar­ri­ers young im­mi­grants face in get­ting a driver’s li­cense in Ari­zona, Ms. Tum­lin said.

A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Cir­cuit Court of Ap­peals in San Fran­cisco found that there was no le­git­i­mate state in­ter­est in treat­ing young im­mi­grants granted de­ferred ac­tion on de­por­ta­tion dif­fer­ently from other non­cit­i­zens who could ap­ply for driver’s li­censes. In­stead, the panel sug­gested that the pol­icy was in­tended to ex­press hos­til­ity to­ward the young im­mi­grants, in part be­cause of the fed­eral gov­ern­ment’s pol­icy ac­com­mo­dat­ing them.

The rul­ing comes dur­ing a na­tional fo­cus on the topic, as tens of thou­sands of im­mi­grants from Cen­tral Amer­ica — many of them un­ac­com­pa­nied chil­dren — have il­le­gally en­tered the coun­try in re­cent months, strain­ing the ca­pac­ity of de­ten­tion cen­ters along the U.S.-Mex­ico bor­der.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion in June 2012 took ad­min­is­tra­tive steps to shield thou­sands of im­mi­grants from de­por­ta­tion and ex­pand their le­gal rights. The move as­sists im­mi­grants younger than 30 who came to the U.S. be­fore turn­ing 16, have been in the coun­try for at least five con­tin­u­ous years, are en­rolled in or have grad­u­ated from a high school or a GED pro­gram or have served in the mil­i­tary. Aside from al­low­ing driver’s li­censes, ap­pli­cants also were al­lowed to pur­sue a two-year re­new­able work per­mit.

About 520,000 peo­ple have been ap­proved na­tion­ally to take part in the pro­gram, in­clud­ing about 19,000 in Ari­zona.

Reyna Mon­toya, 23, a Mesa, Ariz., res­i­dent who took part in the Obama pro­gram, said she feels that her in­abil­ity to get a driver’s li­cense has put her at a com­pet­i­tive dis­ad­van­tage as she searches for a teach­ing job. With­out a li­cense, Ms. Mon­toya said she is un­able to drive stu­dents to ex­tra­cur­ric­u­lar ac­tiv­i­ties — a ques­tion that is raised on job ap­pli­ca­tions.

Ms. Mon­toya re­gards Mon­day’s court de­ci­sion as a vic­tory for young im­mi­grants but noted that they still face bar­ri­ers in Ari­zona, in­clud­ing a 2006 voter-ap­proved law that de­nies cheaper in-state tu­i­tion and fi­nan­cial as­sis­tance at pub­lic uni­ver­sities and com­mu­nity col­leges to im­mi­grants who are in the coun­try il­le­gally. “We are cel­e­brat­ing now, but we are go­ing to have to con­tinue to or­ga­nize,” Ms. Mon­toya said.

Ms. Brewer is­sued an ex­ec­u­tive or­der in Au­gust 2012 di­rect­ing state agen­cies to deny driver’s li­censes and other pub­lic ben­e­fits to young im­mi­grants who get work au­tho­ri­za­tion un­der the de­ferred ac­tion pro­gram.

The ap­peals panel or­dered a lower court judge to is­sue a pre­lim­i­nary in­junc­tion block­ing Ms. Brewer’s ex­ec­u­tive or­der while the case is lit­i­gated. It’s un­known how long it will take for the case to con­clude.

Ne­braska is the only other state to have made sim­i­lar de­ni­als, and a fed­eral judge this year dis­missed a law­suit con­test­ing the state’s pol­icy.

United States - North America - Arizona - Paul Davenport - Jan Brewer - Arizona state government


You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here