U.S. reasserts need to keep domestic surveillance secret

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

The federal government reasserted its claim of state-secrets privilege Friday to keep under wraps what it says are operational details in two long-running lawsuits alleging the National Security Agency's surveillance of Americans' emails and phone calls is unlawful.

Federal officials also for the first time publicly acknowledged that President George W. Bush in 2001 authorized sweeping collections of Americans' phone and Internet data -- programs that operated for years solely under executive power before being brought under court and congressional oversight.

The director of national intelligence, James Clapper, said in a court filing Friday that Mr. Bush authorized the collection efforts on Oct. 4, 2001, shortly after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

The NSA's data collections were part of a broader, previously disclosed counterterrorism effort that included warrantless interception of emails and phone calls. A modified, targeted form of that warrantless surveillance was approved several years ago by Congress but is still the focus of the lawsuits challenging its legality.

"In my judgment, disclosure of still-classified details regarding these intelligence-gathering activities, either directly or indirectly, would seriously compromise, if not destroy, important and vital ongoing intelligence operations," Mr. Clapper said in the declaration filed in U.S. District Court in Northern California.

The government is asking the court to dismiss the two cases on grounds that the plaintiffs, Carolyn Jewel and Virginia Shubert, have not proved they were monitored by the NSA's interception of their phone calls or emails. To prove that they were would require disclosure of collection techniques that could cause "exceptionally grave damage" to national security, officials said.

Ms. Jewel is suing on behalf of all AT&T customers, and Ms. Shubert is suing on behalf of all Americans.

"As a matter of course, the NSA cannot publicly confirm or deny whether any individual is or has been subject to intelligence-gathering activities, because to do so would tend to reveal actual targets or subjects," said Frances Fleisch, acting NSA deputy director, in a declaration also filed Friday.

The government also declassified and posted eight other declarations filed in the litigation by senior intelligence officials alleging that national security would be harmed by disclosing program information.

But Cindy Cohn, legal director for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which is representing the plaintiffs, said the government's claim that information about whether they are indiscriminately collecting Americans' communications is "ridiculous at this point."

"The American people know they're being surveilled," she said. "The government is trying to reset the clock in order to avoid an open judicial determination about whether that surveillance is legal."

The government has already suffered a setback in the case. U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White in July ruled that the government could not assert a state-secrets privilege when the underlying law, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, offers a process to hear classified evidence in closed chambers.

But government lawyers said Friday that in order for that process to apply, the plaintiffs had to first prove they were surveilled.

At issue is the NSA's program to intercept phone and email communications without a warrant, which was placed under court supervision in 2007 and then authorized by Congress in 2007 and 2008. Ms. Jewel also is challenging the agency's collection of Americans' phone metadata, or call logs that include numbers dialed and call lengths and times. That program was placed under court supervision in 2006 on the basis of a statute that has been reauthorized several times since then.

The declassification of the Bush administration's authorization of the programs came in response to Judge White's order to the government to review declarations filed in the case.


Join the conversation:

Commenting policy | How to report abuse
To report inappropriate comments, abuse and/or repeat offenders, please send an email to socialmedia@post-gazette.com and include a link to the article and a copy of the comment. Your report will be reviewed in a timely manner. Thank you.
Commenting policy | How to report abuse

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here