Clinton defends actions on Benghazi

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

WASHINGTON -- In one of her final appearances as secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton on Wednesday vigorously defended her handling of the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, which killed four Americans and prompted a scathing review of State Department procedures.

"As I have said many times, I take responsibility, and nobody is more committed to getting this right," she said, reading a statement during a day of testimony before Senate and House committees. "I am determined to leave the State Department and our country safer, stronger and more secure."

But Ms. Clinton, whose appearance before Congress had been postponed since December because of illness, quickly departed from the script. She jousted with Republicans lawmakers over who deserved blame for the security problems at the compound and choked up as she described being at Joint Base Andrews, outside Washington, when the bodies of the Americans killed in the assault arrived from Libya.

"I stood next to President Obama as the Marines carried those flag-draped caskets off the plane at Andrews," she said. "I put my arms around the mothers and fathers, sisters and brothers, sons and daughters."

The continuing controversy over the attack, which resulted in the deaths of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans, has cast a cloud over Ms. Clinton's final months at the State Department. It also has enormous political implications for the former New York senator, who is already regarded as the front-runner for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination if she chooses to run. It was the first time she had faced extensive questioning about her role in the episode.

In essence, Ms. Clinton's approach was to accept the responsibility for security lapses in Benghazi, but not the blame.

"I feel responsible for the nearly 70,000 people who work for the State Department," Ms. Clinton told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in the morning. "But the specific security requests pertaining to Benghazi, you know, were handled by the security professionals in the department. I didn't see those requests. They didn't come to me. I didn't approve them. I didn't deny them."

When the question of her role was taken up again in the afternoon hearing by the House Foreign Affairs Committee chairman, Ed Royce, R-Calif., Ms. Clinton acknowledged that she had been briefed on a series of events that indicated that security in Benghazi was deteriorating in the months before the attack. They included placement of a bomb at the compound's outer wall in June and an ambush that month on the British ambassador. But she said she had gone along with a recommendation from subordinates that the Benghazi post be kept open and assumed that they would take the necessary steps to protect it.

Ms. Clinton first publicly took responsibility for the September attack in an Oct. 15 interview with television reporters. Since then, she has committed herself to putting in place all of the recommendations of an independent review that was led by Thomas Pickering, a former U.S. ambassador, and retired Adm. Mike Mullen, who served as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

For all the hours of testimony, the hearings did little to clarify the White House role in overseeing the U.S. presence in Libya before the attack, or to explain why the Pentagon had few forces available on the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks to respond quickly to any assault on diplomatic outposts in the region.

One of the sharpest exchanges of the day came when Ms. Clinton responded to questions from Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., by saying there was too much focus on how the Benghazi attack had been characterized in its early hours, and not enough on how to prevent a recurrence. Republicans have repeatedly charged that Obama administration officials deliberately played down the attack, focusing much of their criticism on United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice, once Mr. Obama's choice to replace Ms. Clinton.

"Was it because of a protest, or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they'd go kill some Americans? What difference, at this point, does it make?" Ms. Clinton said, her voice rising. "It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, senator."

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., asserted that the Obama administration's aversion to nation-building had precluded it from providing the training and assistance that would have helped the fledgling Libyan government in Tripoli confront growing security threats from militants.

Ms. Clinton responded that Congress had delayed aid to Libya, and said she would provide a list of steps that had been taken to train and equip Libyan forces.

A persistent line of questioning by Republican lawmakers concerns Ms. Rice's initial comments that the attack might have resulted from a protest over an anti-Islamic video that spun out of control. Ms. Clinton defended Ms. Rice, even as she appeared to distance herself from the ambassador's comments. "I told the American people that heavily armed militants assaulted our compound, and I vowed to bring them to justice," Ms. Clinton said.

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman, John Kerry, D-Mass., has been nominated to succeed Ms. Clinton and is scheduled to appear before his committee today for a confirmation hearing. To avoid the perception of a conflict of interest, the hearing Wednesday was led by Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., the incoming chairman, and Mr. Kerry did not attend.

nation


Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here