Many not poor enough for Medicaid

States that reject Obama health law have lowest limits

Share with others:


Print Email Read Later

MIAMI -- Sandra Pico is poor, but not poor enough.

The 52-year-old home health aide makes about $15,000 a year, supporting her daughter and unemployed husband. She thought she'd be able to get health insurance after the Supreme Court upheld President Barack Obama's health care law.

Then she heard that her own governor won't agree to the federal plan to extend Medicaid coverage to people like her in two years. So she expects to remain uninsured, struggling to pay for her blood pressure medicine.

"You fall through the cracks and there's nothing you can do about it," Ms. Pico said. "It makes me feel like garbage, like the American dream -- my dream in my homeland -- is not being accomplished."

Many working parents such as Ms. Pico are below the federal poverty line but don't qualify for Medicaid, a decades-old state-federal insurance program. That's especially true in states where conservative governors say they'll reject the Medicaid expansion under Mr. Obama's health law.

In South Carolina, a yearly income of $16,900 is too much for Medicaid for a family of three. In Florida, $11,000 a year is too much. In Mississippi, $8,200 a year is too much. In Louisiana and Texas, earning more than just $5,000 a year makes you ineligible for Medicaid.

Governors in those five states have said they'll reject the Medicaid expansion underpinning Mr. Obama's health law after the Supreme Court's decision gave states that option. They favor small government and say they can't afford the added cost to their states, even if it's delayed by several years. Some states estimate the expansion could ultimately cost them a billion dollars a year or more.

Many people affected by the decision are working parents who are poor -- but not poor enough -- to qualify for Medicaid.

Republican Mitt Romney's new running mate, conservative Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan, has a budget plan that would turn Medicaid over to states and sharply limit federal dollars. Mr. Romney hasn't specifically said where he stands on Mr. Ryan's idea, but has expressed broad support for his vice-presidential pick's proposals.

Medicaid now covers an estimated 70 million Americans and would cover an estimated 7 million more in 2014 under the Obama health law's expansion. In contrast, Mr. Ryan's plan could mean 14 million to 27 million Americans would ultimately lose coverage, even beyond the effect of a repeal of the health law, according to the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation's analysis of Mr. Ryan's 2011 budget plan.

For now, most states don't cover childless adults, but all states cover some low-income parents. The income cutoff, however, varies widely, state to state.

Most states cover children in low-income families. Manuel and Sandra Pico's 15-year-old daughter is covered by Medicaid. But the suburban Miami couple can't afford private insurance for themselves, and they make too much for Florida's Medicaid.

Manuel Pico, a carpenter, used to make more than $20,000 a year, but has struggled to find work in the past three years after the real estate market collapsed. He occasionally picks up day jobs or takes care of the neighbor's yard. Sandra Pico would like to work full time, but can't afford to pay someone to watch her 34-year-old sister, who has Down syndrome.

"No matter how hard I work, I'm not going to get anywhere," Sandra Pico said. "If you're not rich, you just don't have it."

In San Juan, Texas, 22-year-old Matthew Solis makes about $8,700 a year -- too much to qualify for Medicaid in that state. Mr. Solis, a single father with joint custody of his 4-year-old daughter, said he works about 25 hours per week at a building supply store, making minimum wage, and is a full-time college student at the University of Texas-Pan American. He aspires to be a school counselor.

He recently sought medical care for food poisoning, visiting a federally funded clinic. But he doesn't see a doctor regularly because he can't afford private insurance. The new health law allows young adults to remain on their parents' insurance until age 26. But that doesn't help Mr. Solis, whose father is uninsured and whose mother died of leukemia when he was 8.

His governor, Rick Perry, like Ms. Pico's governor, Rick Scott, is rejecting the Medicaid expansion. So Mr. Solis, too, is out of luck unless his circumstances dramatically change.

In all but one of the states where governors are rejecting or leaning against the expansion, the income level that disqualifies a parent from Medicaid is below the federal poverty line. Only in New Jersey, where Gov. Chris Christie has said he's leaning against the expansion, is Medicaid available to parents with incomes at the poverty line and slightly above. New Jersey will cover a parent making $24,645 in a family of three.

Most states base Medicaid eligibility for parents on household income and how it compares with the federal poverty level, $18,530 for a family of three in 2011, the year being used for easier state-by-state comparisons.

In Louisiana, the eligibility cutoff for a working parent is 25 percent of federal poverty, or $4,633 for a family of three. In Nevada, it's 87 percent of the federal poverty level, or $16,121 for a family of three. That has been the range in states where governors are likely saying no to expanded Medicaid.

In contrast, states where governors have said they'll expand Medicaid are more generous with working parents. The Medicaid eligibility cutoff ranges in those states from Washington's $13,527 to Minnesota's $39,840.

To be sure, some states with generous coverage for parents have been forced to cut back. Illinois, facing a financial crisis, ended coverage last month for 25,000-plus working parents. Even so, Illinois still covers working parents with incomes slightly higher than the poverty line.

Obamacare's Medicaid expansion would start covering all citizens in 2014 who make up to roughly $15,400 for an individual, $30,650 for a family of four. The federal government will pay the full cost of the Medicaid expansion through 2016. After that, the states will pick up 5 percent of the cost through 2019, and 10 percent of the cost thereafter.

"We don't need the federal government telling us what to do when it comes to meeting the needs of the citizens of our states," Florida Gov. Rick Scott wrote recently in a U.S. News and World Report opinion piece. "And we don't need Washington putting states on the hook for future budget obligations."

Many conservatives view Medicaid as a wasteful, highly flawed program. Many doctors across the nation won't treat Medicaid patients because payments they get are so low.

nation


Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

You have 2 remaining free articles this month

Try unlimited digital access

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here

You’ve reached the limit of free articles this month.

To continue unlimited reading

If you are an existing subscriber,
link your account for free access. Start here