|
Missing a great opportunity (cont.)
Cracks in the system
Still, officials point to some cracks in the system, which will only worsen as the
85-plus population grows rapidly in the near future and the baby boomer population turns
65 starting after 2010.
Among the problems:
Not enough help is
available to the group of older people who have too much income to qualify for Medical
Assistance but not enough to afford costly home repairs, personal care services and other
expenses.
Waiting lists for
government-sponsored assistance, such as someone to come into a frail persons home
to do laundry and housekeeping, have been getting longer and are likely to keep doing so
because the growth in that population has outpaced funding increases. Lottery revenues
have been relatively flat during the 1990s. The result: More than 8,700 elderly
individuals statewide, including 1,000 in Allegheny County, are waiting for services.
Traditional senior centers
are losing their relevance because younger, more active seniors are uninterested in bingo
and congregate meals, which strike them as musty anachronisms. Many aging officials
believe too many of these small neighborhood centers exist, and that they need to be
consolidated into bigger facilities that can provide more enrichment classes, health
services and valuable information.
Government health care
funding has been too focused on nursing home care, hospitalization and the neediest senior
citizens instead of promoting community and home care that prolong peoples
independence.
The hottest new elder-care
trend of the 1990s development of homelike assisted-living facilities in the
suburbs is out of the price range of the majority of seniors who could benefit from
it.
Officials say all these issues are being discussed in Pennsylvania, and new programs
are beginning to address some of them.
The state Department of Public Welfare has gradually been shifting Medical Assistance
dollars into home care in recent years. The United Way hopes early next year to expand
small programs that send volunteers into senior citizens homes to make maintenance
and safety improvements. Various health programs have sprouted that are aimed at
preventive care and delaying institutionalization.
None of that guarantees that there wont be a crisis of too many elderly people
needing too much care sometime in the future, but officials believe that planning is
headed in the right direction.
"I dont want to give a rosy picture. Were going to have to work hard.
Theres going to have to be real creative things done," said Sharon Stevick,
director of Allegheny Countys Area Agency on Aging, who said senior centers might
expect less funding, and older people themselves might have to help pay for formerly free
government services in the future.
"Demand for services is going to go up, but we can shave on the growth in
costs," Pennsylvania Aging Secretary Richard Browdie suggested, by emphasizing
community care over institutionalization, exploring new ways for elderly people to help
pay for services, and benefiting from societys advances in preserving physical and
mental health.
"The shift toward a heavier reliance on home- and community-based services and
some kind of matchup between those enhanced services and assisted living is absolutely in
the cards," said Browdie, who is also president of the American Society on Aging.
"At least Pennsylvania has a history of worrying about what its going to do
about its population of older people in the future."
Why people stay here
The intangibles of life in Southwestern Pennsylvania perhaps more than any
formal government program or agency service could be the best asset available to
its more than 400,000 elderly residents.
Alice "Toddy" Hilliard, executive director for 25 years of Eastern Area Adult
Services, regularly surveys the agencys older clients, and finds they dont
want to stray from their roots despite any hardships theyre facing.
"The most important things to older people? Neighbors, church, friends. Not
transportation, not nearby health services, not someone to shovel the sidewalk," she
said.
"One of the strengths here is the communities themselves," agreed Mary Hart,
executive director of the multi-service Center in the Woods senior center in California,
Pa. "Neighbors really do take care of each other. I see that every day in these
little towns where there are few services.
Many times its old neighbors
taking care of old neighbors."
Among that dependent population are individuals who left Pennsylvania after retirement,
only to return to be near relatives and friends. Demographers say Pennsylvania is a state
that loses more people in their 60s than it gains, but after that age, relatively few
people leave, and just as many in the older group return, although they often have
diminished health and resources.
Still, most older people dont move away at all. Browdie and others are worried
about the potential for a downward spiral in some older communities, where elderly
residents find it hard to maintain homes, and then move into institutions or die, leaving
inheritors who are unable to fix up and sell the properties.
"You have all those [old] people in rowhouses who just dont seem likely to
go anywhere," Browdie said. "You have blocks that will have a lot of vacant
properties, because it doesnt seem likely that anyone will move in."
Local officials such as McKeesport Mayor Joe Bendel and Homestead Mayor Betty Esper,
both with elderly populations of 23 percent in the last census, say that some of their
older residents may have trouble keeping up their properties, but they havent seen
entire blocks decline because of aging homeowners.
And even though many of their seniors have limited resources, Bendel and Esper see them
as being beneficial in other ways.
"Many of our elderly seniors are contributors, not of money, but to churches, to
participation in organizations. They bring a sage experience to the table with our
youth," said Bendel, who is 67 himself.
|