If only Panetta had a do-over, he could use it to keep a great general working for his country
February 21, 2013 10:00 AM
Haraz N. Ghanbari/Associated Press
Marine Gen. John R. Allen speaks during a news conference last year at the Pentagon.
By David Ignatius
As Leon Panetta spends his final days as secretary of defense, there's one decision I hope he'd like to do over: His order back in November to authorize a Defense Department investigation of thousands of emails from Gen. John R. Allen, which the FBI had just dumped in Mr. Panetta's lap.
In today's Washington culture, dropping the matter would have been an unusual and gutsy call. Mr. Panetta would have exposed himself to criticism for being insufficiently zealous in order to protect the privacy and reputation of Gen. Allen, the Marine four-star who by many accounts has been the best commander the United States has had in Afghanistan.
Once Mr. Panetta authorized the investigation, the damage to Gen. Allen was done. Having decided to launch a probe, the Pentagon of course had to tell reporters about it and put Gen. Allen's promotion to become NATO commander in Brussels on hold. Then began the speculation about what Gen. Allen might have exchanged in his email messages with Jill Kelley, the Tampa socialite who had tried to make herself useful to Tampa-based Central Command when Gen. Allen was its leader.
Mr. Panetta apparently had felt he had no choice but to investigate the emails, given the advice he got from Pentagon lawyers. A senior defense official explained: "The secretary's decision to refer the matter to the Department's Inspector General was made upon the recommendation of senior civilian and military lawyers who conducted an initial review of the materials. The secretary threaded the needle carefully. He believed Gen. Allen should remain in command [in Afghanistan] and should have the opportunity to be [NATO commander] following the I.G. review. This was a nuanced set of decisions, not a single decision."
The investigation ended last month with the finding predicted months earlier by every official I talked to who had any inkling of what was in the emails: Gen. Allen had done nothing unbecoming an officer. There was some flirtatious and racy language that might have been embarrassing, but nothing more. Yet the damage to Gen. Allen and his family was done.
The next step would have been Senate confirmation for the NATO job, and another public kerfuffle over the emails. Given the way Washington works, it's almost a certainty that someone would have leaked titillating phrases from them. Gen. Allen decided that he and his wife, who has been very ill, had had enough. He withdrew his name from consideration for the NATO post and will retire.
Government officials earn their "profiles in courage" when they do something they think is morally right -- knowing that others will criticize it -- and then take the heat. Leon Panetta has often fit that mold, and he will leave the Pentagon with a distinguished record as secretary.
But I'd like to think this is one case where Mr. Panetta wishes he had stopped an investigation that his gut should have told him would lead nowhere -- and taken whatever criticism came his way.